carlnewton
Registered User.
- Local time
- Today, 10:31
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2008
- Messages
- 19
I'm working with Access 2003, split database. I'm trying to apply a custom ReplicationConflictFunction as described in the VB Help file (and I've poured through many web pages looking for answers).
I believe that I've done everything as specified. However, when I synchronize a replica via the VB synchronize method and I have record conflicts, my custom function won't run. The default Conflict Resolver runs instead. I've read that the the optional DDL argument must be set to true or the custom function won't run and I think that I've done this properly using code that I've found on another site. I've stepped through it and appears to function as expected.
I'm trying to make this work from the front-end of a split database. I'm wondering if the ReplicationConflictFunction doesn't work when executed on a front-end? For example, on my front end if I look at the Replication menu the only menu option available is the 'Create Replica' option. I already have a master and local replica and I use code to set the connect strings to point to the desired back-end.
Has anybody seen this problem?
Thanks
I believe that I've done everything as specified. However, when I synchronize a replica via the VB synchronize method and I have record conflicts, my custom function won't run. The default Conflict Resolver runs instead. I've read that the the optional DDL argument must be set to true or the custom function won't run and I think that I've done this properly using code that I've found on another site. I've stepped through it and appears to function as expected.
I'm trying to make this work from the front-end of a split database. I'm wondering if the ReplicationConflictFunction doesn't work when executed on a front-end? For example, on my front end if I look at the Replication menu the only menu option available is the 'Create Replica' option. I already have a master and local replica and I use code to set the connect strings to point to the desired back-end.
Has anybody seen this problem?
Thanks