- Local time
- Today, 09:07
- Mar 14, 2017
Yeah ... which to me reinforces what I mentioned, IF I understand what OP is saying correctly and the overall situation.Note post 9.
The solution was either redesign the table to match what the query was returning (apparently a Single), or, redesign the query to match what was really desired (which seems to have been double). Anyway...if they are happy somehow I am happy.