in some ways we are always at a crossroads: decisions are made and a path is taken that we cannot or it is doubtful we could ever reverse.
Have we passed the biggest turning point in (human) history? Learning how to use fire, domestication of crops, the wheel, ability to extract metals, the application of scientific method, the development of mechanical machines, nuclear energy, space exploration, electronics, AI .... and I'll tack on a few others that are maybe "softer" :
- money/tokens to facilitate trade, economics applied to direct economies, politics and collective self-determination, ending state-sanctioned slavery, equal rights for women ...
Many are not point-in-time events. There might also be less positive crossroad that we may have already arrived at:
- the demands of the human population exceeding the capacity of the planet to support that population.
There are many factors here including
Does human society have a capacity to get to a balance but avoid the savage rule of nature?
Our politics and in general, the view of business economics is to expand and grow - always. However, resources are limited, as Malthus recognised, and as population grows demand exceeds supply and populations (by extension civilisations) collapse. It becomes a Darwinian struggle for survival.
Do we have the capacity to innovate, to cooperate, to plan, to avoid conflict. One small blue speck ...
Have we passed the biggest turning point in (human) history? Learning how to use fire, domestication of crops, the wheel, ability to extract metals, the application of scientific method, the development of mechanical machines, nuclear energy, space exploration, electronics, AI .... and I'll tack on a few others that are maybe "softer" :
- money/tokens to facilitate trade, economics applied to direct economies, politics and collective self-determination, ending state-sanctioned slavery, equal rights for women ...
Many are not point-in-time events. There might also be less positive crossroad that we may have already arrived at:
- the demands of the human population exceeding the capacity of the planet to support that population.
There are many factors here including
- Human reproduction rates / fertility
- Available productive (agricultural) land / desertification / expanding urbanisation
- Preservation of ecological diversity / risks of monoculture
- Sustainable / available energy and transport
- Pollution / clean air and water affecting health and disease
Does human society have a capacity to get to a balance but avoid the savage rule of nature?
Our politics and in general, the view of business economics is to expand and grow - always. However, resources are limited, as Malthus recognised, and as population grows demand exceeds supply and populations (by extension civilisations) collapse. It becomes a Darwinian struggle for survival.
Do we have the capacity to innovate, to cooperate, to plan, to avoid conflict. One small blue speck ...