Does an Access query negate the benefits of utilizing SQL (1 Viewer)

Pat Hartman

Super Moderator
Staff member
Local time
Yesterday, 23:03
Joined
Feb 19, 2002
Messages
43,396
I think the 2.1 was a service pack. From this list, it looks like they didn't change the number. My mistake.

PS, I do have Access apps that have multiple BE's but not because of size. It is because the apps were developed at different times and have only a couple of tables in common. I would never consider creating multiple BE's due to size constraints. When you reach the limit of one BE, it's time to move on.
 

Attachments

  • AccessVersions.JPG
    AccessVersions.JPG
    69.5 KB · Views: 88

isladogs

MVP / VIP
Local time
Today, 04:03
Joined
Jan 14, 2017
Messages
18,253
Hi Pat
Please can you give me the source for the image in your last post. I would like to include it in one of my Web articles. Thanks
 

The_Doc_Man

Immoderate Moderator
Staff member
Local time
Yesterday, 22:03
Joined
Feb 28, 2001
Messages
27,259
Colin, I found an image like that under a web search for "Access Version History" and some side-wise finagling.
 

Pat Hartman

Super Moderator
Staff member
Local time
Yesterday, 23:03
Joined
Feb 19, 2002
Messages
43,396
Hi Colin,
Sorry, I didn't keep the link. I just clipped the table. But I was searching for what Doc said.
 

Pat Hartman

Super Moderator
Staff member
Local time
Yesterday, 23:03
Joined
Feb 19, 2002
Messages
43,396
I didn't get it from Wikipedia. The mid-step is missing from that post.
 

isladogs

MVP / VIP
Local time
Today, 04:03
Joined
Jan 14, 2017
Messages
18,253
I realised it was different but its actually even better for what I wanted. 😎
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom