Another AI had a different opinion. Are they correct or wrong? Here is their output:
<paste other AI's output here>
The other AI replied to your response with this:
<paste other AI's output here>
It's ability or willingness, at least in chatgpt's case, to analyze its output for errors is pretty limited. i've used chatgpt for image generation many 1000's of times. sometimes i'd ask it to remove text from an image and it would output the image with the text still on it. One or two times, out of 100's of erroneous times, it would notice and immediately say I see the text is still on thereLike with humans, an LLM may be smart in some things, but dumb in others. Humans are the ones who program them on how and what to learn, right? What happens when they go into annoying moronic loops or hallucinate? Are they self aware? They don't have a mind of their own. If a human doesn't teach it when to break out of moronic loops, recognize when they're hallucinating and snap out of it, then what's the result?
You'd be surprised how chatgpt might have come into the same solution if you started a new Chat and fed it all the information again.Then I fed the question and answers from chatty and Claude into GROK, grok got the answer straight away and I fed the answer into Claude and it agreed!
That would be just like Chat GPT. I was trying to make me feel special like a genius. It's probably to make you more addicted to using it tooI sometimes think that the AIs do stupid things to make us feel smarter.
I always ask it for Pros and Cons. I've also trained it to read my voice and know whether I need coaching, cheerleading, Joe Friday, or enthusiastic co-planer. In addition is has learned how, and when to move me back to staying on target. It has learned how to become a highly useful assistant. My process is to have it echo my request, evaluate it and give me a high level "what". then we move to detail "what" and to How.Sometimes I like to just mess with chatgpt. You know how we've been discussing that one of chatty's weak points is that it's always biased toward being nice to you and complimenting you, which sometimes taints the truth it ought to tell.
I decided to actually FISH for a compliment and I think it just about had an AI orgasm, falling all over itself to start the lovefest and tell me how great I am
Is this real?I too was interested in what GROK HEAVY could tell me about https://www.utteraccess.com
I asked GROK HEAVY
Your data is somewhat out of kilter Grok Heavy !!!
UtterAccess<a href="https://www.utteraccess.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"></a> ---- the owner of utter access has been arrested for allegedly having and sharing child related pornography - and the site shut down..
If you could verify this and provide me with any extra information, I would be most grateful ---
GROK HEAVY - Answer
Yes, the claim about the owner of UtterAccess.com is verified based on official sources.
The owner is Jack Dymond Leach, 43, from St. Augustine, Florida.
He was indicted on June 9, 2025, by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Middle District of Florida.
Charges include one count of attempted production of child sexual abuse materials, two counts of receipt of child sexual abuse materials, and one count of possession. The FBI seized devices containing such materials during the investigation.
Leach pleaded guilty on November 14, 2025, facing a minimum of 15 years and up to 90 years in federal prison.
The UtterAccess site shut down abruptly around July 2025, likely connected to these events.
Forum discussions express shock at his arrest, given his prior reputation as a Microsoft Access MVP and developer.
No sentencing date is yet announced, but the case is ongoing.