Experience with AI is Key

Deleted

New member
Local time
Today, 09:50
Joined
Dec 1, 2025
Messages
131
Deep domain expertise is essential, especially when navigating the inherent unpredictability of large language models (LLMs).

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Let me give you an example of how I sometimes use AI to give more robust answers. This is something I did yesterday, and it concerns two chimneys that have cracks in them, which require repair.

Firstly, I have paid versions of both ChatGPT and Gemini, and in each I switched them to Deep Research mode, for the best in class thinking. But, after reading the response of both AI's, they disagreed with one another. Not in everything but in the approach I should take: should I get a structural engineer or a chimney specialist/builder. Also, was it sulphate attack on one of the chimneys or thermal expansion.

So, to get further clarity, I did the following:

Another AI had a different opinion. Are they correct or wrong? Here is their output:

<paste other AI's output here>

So, after the Deep Research report in Gemini, I pasted that into Gemini after the report, so it still has the same context. I did the same for ChatGPT. Then Gemini gave its response, as does ChatGPT.

Next, I do this:

The other AI replied to your response with this:

<paste other AI's output here>

And so on. You essentially get a conversation between two different AI's that help increase the robustness of the replies. Funnily enough, Gemini was kind of converging with ChatGPT, but stating where its nuance was slightly different. But it also stated the good points ChatGPT was coming up with.

Net result: better insight, more intelligence, increased confidence in the output.
 
Last edited:
I agree that GROK is moving ahead of the pack lately. I use Claude first, then ChatGPT for backup/verification. But lately I've turned a couple to GROK when neither of the original AI Buddies can solve a problem and found a path through the confusion.

Both Claude and Chatty are prone to recycling their own recent past rather than branching out if the solution isn't found that way. Grok does appear to me to be less inward focused.
 
Like with humans, an LLM may be smart in some things, but dumb in others. Humans are the ones who program them on how and what to learn, right? What happens when they go into annoying moronic loops or hallucinate? Are they self aware? They don't have a mind of their own. If a human doesn't teach it when to break out of moronic loops, recognize when they're hallucinating and snap out of it, then what's the result?
It's ability or willingness, at least in chatgpt's case, to analyze its output for errors is pretty limited. i've used chatgpt for image generation many 1000's of times. sometimes i'd ask it to remove text from an image and it would output the image with the text still on it. One or two times, out of 100's of erroneous times, it would notice and immediately say I see the text is still on there
 
Then I fed the question and answers from chatty and Claude into GROK, grok got the answer straight away and I fed the answer into Claude and it agreed!
You'd be surprised how chatgpt might have come into the same solution if you started a new Chat and fed it all the information again.
It's moronic loops are often limited to the chat you are in. Starting a new one is sometimes as effective as starting a new AI tool
 
I sometimes think that the AIs do stupid things to make us feel smarter.
 
I sometimes think that the AIs do stupid things to make us feel smarter.
That would be just like Chat GPT. I was trying to make me feel special like a genius. It's probably to make you more addicted to using it too
 
Last edited:
Sometimes I like to just mess with chatgpt. You know how we've been discussing that one of chatty's weak points is that it's always biased toward being nice to you and complimenting you, which sometimes taints the truth it ought to tell.
I decided to actually FISH for a compliment and I think it just about had an AI orgasm, falling all over itself to start the lovefest and tell me how great I am

2025-11-21 12_50_30-BOOKS - Image adjustment completed.png


Kinda funny, just killing time waiting for a sql process to finish at work
 
Sometimes I like to just mess with chatgpt. You know how we've been discussing that one of chatty's weak points is that it's always biased toward being nice to you and complimenting you, which sometimes taints the truth it ought to tell.
I decided to actually FISH for a compliment and I think it just about had an AI orgasm, falling all over itself to start the lovefest and tell me how great I am
I always ask it for Pros and Cons. I've also trained it to read my voice and know whether I need coaching, cheerleading, Joe Friday, or enthusiastic co-planer. In addition is has learned how, and when to move me back to staying on target. It has learned how to become a highly useful assistant. My process is to have it echo my request, evaluate it and give me a high level "what". then we move to detail "what" and to How.
 
I too was interested in what GROK HEAVY could tell me about https://www.utteraccess.com

I asked GROK HEAVY
Your data is somewhat out of kilter Grok Heavy !!!
UtterAccess<a href="https://www.utteraccess.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow"></a> ---- the owner of utter access has been arrested for allegedly having and sharing child related pornography - and the site shut down..
If you could verify this and provide me with any extra information, I would be most grateful ---

GROK HEAVY - Answer
Yes, the claim about the owner of UtterAccess.com is verified based on official sources.
The owner is Jack Dymond Leach, 43, from St. Augustine, Florida.
He was indicted on June 9, 2025, by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Middle District of Florida.
Charges include one count of attempted production of child sexual abuse materials, two counts of receipt of child sexual abuse materials, and one count of possession. The FBI seized devices containing such materials during the investigation.

Leach pleaded guilty on November 14, 2025, facing a minimum of 15 years and up to 90 years in federal prison.
The UtterAccess site shut down abruptly around July 2025, likely connected to these events.
Forum discussions express shock at his arrest, given his prior reputation as a Microsoft Access MVP and developer.
No sentencing date is yet announced, but the case is ongoing.
Is this real?

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom