Is USA directly entering in the war, good or bad?

[The_Doc_Man]

That's a can of worms worth reopening. Did we ever really get the people involved? Some will say yes, we killed the mastermind. Honestly, I still have lingering doubts.

I seriously doubt we got EVERYONE involved in the planning, but I've heard that the intelligence gathered on the raid to Osama's compound was a true treasure trove that helped to pretty much end the effectiveness of Al-Qaeda. I would bet we got a LOT of the planning personnel.

 

[SachAccess]

You all may agree with their chants of "Death to Israel" and "Death to America" but not all of us think it is charming.

Dear Pat, did any of my posts ever indicated above sentiment? Would request you to not to pass on such blanket remarks.

 

[SachAccess]

It is good to support Israel, and I'll be clear on that.

Thanks a lot for understanding my intention and helping with the answer. Have a nice day ahead.

 

[Pat Hartman]

Dear Pat, did any of my posts ever indicated above sentiment?

Yes. You equate Hamas with Israel. You equate Iran with countries who do not threaten to destroy other countries. You seem to think it is perfectly OK for Iran to obtain a nuclear weapon which it will then use to destroy Israel and the US if they are still able to launch after Israel retaliates in kind.

I respect all the countries involved. Please correct me if am wrong.

I1 saying to I2 that you can not have XYZ.
I1 has it. A saying I2 can not have it but A too has it.
A and I1 saying having a XYZ is a risk to humanity.
P has XYZ. A says P is a fantastic country.
P is known for doing things which are not good for humanity.
R, C and N has XYZ and can provide XYZ to I2.
Now if I3 takes same stance against P what will be the advice from I1 and A.
And who decides that who can have XYZ and who can not have it.
Getting confused here.

My post is related only about XYZ. I am not going to other things which I1 or I2 or A does or have done in the past.

My question to you - Do you understand that Israel abandoned Gaza and Hamas and the citizens they are holding hostage to their own devices more than 20 years ago? And during that time, Hamas has stolen all the donated money from countries around the world and used that money to buy bombs to shoot at Israel rather than make the lives of the innocents better?

 

[SachAccess]

Yes. You equate Hamas with Israel.

Hi @Pat Hartman , though I do not do so, a perception might have been created due to my original post, may be my mistake to paint everything with the same brush while trying to simplify the example. I guess, I should I avoided this entire post. I respect you and I understand the pain you feel while replying to this thread. I would prefer not to take this any further and hurt anyone. Have a nice day ahead.

 

[The_Doc_Man]

Not to mention that Hamas has torn up the plumbing infrastructure because when they get a long enough pipe, they can (AND DO!!!!) make short range ballistic missiles. They deny their own people water because the plumbing can be weaponized. Do you not see the virulent evil?

 

[SachAccess]

Do you not see the virulent evil?

sir I see that, I agree that I should not have posted this question. Have a nice day ahead.

 

[Pat Hartman]

Posing the question isn't the problem, assuming you actually wanted an answer. Equating Hamas with civilized people is the problem. There is nothing civilized about Hamas.