Multiple stocks/warehouses?

A1ex037

Registered User.
Local time
Today, 16:56
Joined
Feb 10, 2018
Messages
50
Hello everyone,
I am trying to figure out how to split stock into 2 different warehouses. Our stock has been created (due to the constant change in order price) on a FIFO basis from here. We're moving one part of a warehouse to a different city (in a time, both cities will hold identical assortment of products). I am thinking of a way to assign quantity immediately on the order form, by splitting quantity column into two to represent quantity for each product at appropriate warehouse. If anyone has some better idea, it would be great.
 
This all depends on exactly how you represent stock quantities anyway, but the solution will have to include a Warehouse ID of some kind in the table that enumerates your stock levels, however you approach it.

The way we normally recommend stock tracking is to have transactions for each stock item. Then you add up transactions for stock add, stock draw, corrections, etc. Your situation would include n internal transfer from one warehouse to another, so you would have a pair of transactions with intracompany transfer as the transaction type. Search this forum for Inventory articles. We've got close to a gazillion of them.
 
I agree with Doc. Also, I noticed the referenced link in your post. I recall responding to posters who have referenced that post in the past.
You may find related FIFO post helpful. Or this one
Here is an older, related thread dealing with FIFO
As Doc says, there are several post on FIFO in various forums, youtube etc.
 
Last edited:
with FIFO and multiple locations, you need to know what the company policy is for valuation. It may be that they are only interested in total stock value regardless of location, or it may be they need to know the value of stock at each location. The same applies to cost of sales.

I suspect it will be the latter in which case you would need two fields - price and quantity for each warehouse - so says to me you need two rows to split the transaction. And in reality, wouldn't stock be delivered to one location or the other - might be one purchase invoice but would be two lines.

So I also agree with Doc
 
Thank you for your responses. Last few days I have been playing with the original idea, that didn't turned out well (too much overhead with changing parameters on each order). I will try @The_Doc_Man suggestion. I appreciate the note on the stock tracking. Also, @CJ_London excellent comment on having track on stock value separately. Our main stock should hold around 90% of all stocks, while the small one should hold remaining. To answer the delivery: all orders are coming to main location, smaller fraction is moved aside and then transferred to another location.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom