Real History (3 Viewers)

Cotswold

Well-known member
Local time
Today, 23:06
Joined
Dec 31, 2020
Messages
1,037
It is believed the ancient Picts that inhabited Scotland from the late Iron Age until the around the 10th century AD were black, as explained in a new history book for CHILDREN.

It is believed by these crackpots that the ancient Picts who inhabited Scotland from the late Iron Age until the around the 10th century AD were black. As shown in the photograph below from the 9th century, the Picts have captured an Englishman and are in the process of inflicting excruciating pain upon him. Just one example from the new Labour & Liberal Wokepress Ltd book at just £1,255 from Amazon.
(or if you are Scottish, free from your local council, or any primary school)*

So presumably when the Scots saw the Norman invasion in England and Wales they made hundreds of ships and sailed off until they bumped into Africa. They then populated it with black Picts wearing grass skirts instead of kilts due to a lack of sheep and wool weaving factories. As the English and the Scots have always fought each other. When, centuries later the English discovered Africa, old rivalries surfaced resulting in the battle of Rorkes Drift and the making of the historically accurate movie Zulu.
So concludes todays true and accurate history lesson.
Log in for tomorrows lesson on numerous black people in 1930s Thirsk as shown in the latest TV version of All Things Great and Small. (Original and accurate text by James Herriot).

* edited
 

Attachments

  • BlackCelts.jpg
    BlackCelts.jpg
    206.8 KB · Views: 32
Last edited:
The idea of the Picts being dark-skinned is an old one. In the works of the Pulp writer Robert Howard (creator of Conan), the Picts were a small dark people.

As is usual with this nonsense, there is a tiny grain of truth. The first farmers to migrate to Britain were olive-skinned (from the Middle East). That population seems to have evolved lighter skin as an adaption to the lower light levels of Britain, requiring light skin to avoid Vitamin D deficiency.

That original population was largely replaced by the Celtic invaders from the mainland. The Picts were a Celtic group.
 
Prior to (end of the last major ice age) around 6,500 to 8,000 years ago Britain was joined to Europe, so people would have wandered back and forth. An area now under the North Sea now given the name Doggerland no doubt after Dogger Bank a shallow area in the North Sea. Early Britons were probably from Europe. I find it very, very doubtful that it was initially populated by Mediterranean tribes.
Holland, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Germany (Angles & Saxons were German tribes) and others relocated to Britain and continued to do so for centuries. The last invasion being the Normans, originally being from the so called Viking tribes from Western and Northern Europe who had taken over most of France. The advice "go West young man" did not originate in the USA but in Europe thousands of years ago.

Britain is now being invaded by dark skinned Mediterranean tribes called The Boat People who don't claim to be farmers and appear to have no abilities, or tendency to do any productive work, or pay tax.
 
Last edited:
Prior to (end of the last major ice age) around 6,500 to 8,000 years ago Britain was joined to Europe, so people would have wandered back and forth. An area now under the North Sea now given the name Doggerland no doubt after Dogger Bank a shallow area in the North Sea. Early Britons were probably from Europe. I find it very, very doubtful that it was initially populated by Mediterranean tribes.
Holland, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Germany (Angles & Saxons were German tribes) and others relocated to Britain and continued to do so for centuries. The last invasion being the Normans, originally being from the so called Viking tribes from Western and Northern Europe who had taken over most of France. The advice "go West young man" did not originate in the USA but in Europe thousands of years ago.

Britain is now being invaded by dark skinned Mediterranean tribes called The Boat People who don't claim to be farmers and appear to have no abilities, or tendency to do any productive work, or pay tax.
The first human settlers of Britain were hunter-gatherers who arrived by way of Doggerland. Around 4000 BC they were replaced by far more numerous farmers of Mediterranean origin.

As for the recent immigrants to Great Britain, it is worth noting that of the 10 richest Britons, 4 are either immigrants or the children of immigrants. All of them made their money in Britain. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_British_billionaires_by_net_worth.
 
As in the World over hunter gatherers came before farmers. The generally accepted opinion is that whilst agriculture began in Asia Minor the methods were then quickly transferred from there. There is no sound information that those farmers moved and colonised various countries, including Britain. As with metal tools, the knowledge transferred. Agriculture was simply copied from tribe to tribe. Each in turn often improving existing methods. I suspect the opinion that Britain was populated by black farmers from the end of the ice age for millennia until they suddenly and inexplicitly vanished, is wrong. Maybe the idea originated at the BBC, the Guardian, or some other woke institution dreaming up their own version of Britain's history with a committee?

Whilst there have indeed been immigrants who made good in Britain and to the benefit of Britain. It is often the case that some immigrants will prosper, also evidenced throughout the past plus recently the USA, Canada, Australia etc. However, there are far larger numbers who have been the polar opposite. Since WWII immigration has included many who have been violent law breakers. The percentage of violent crimes amongst specific ethnic groups is many, many times that of the main population. Those groups also represent around a half of those in jail/convicted. The same applies to some groups that have a constant predilection to fraud as their main and only occupation.
 
As in the World over hunter gatherers came before farmers. The generally accepted opinion is that whilst agriculture began in Asia Minor the methods were then quickly transferred from there. There is no sound information that those farmers moved and colonised various countries, including Britain. As with metal tools, the knowledge transferred. Agriculture was simply copied from tribe to tribe. Each in turn often improving existing methods. I suspect the opinion that Britain was populated by black farmers from the end of the ice age for millennia until they suddenly and inexplicitly vanished, is wrong. Maybe the idea originated at the BBC, the Guardian, or some other woke institution dreaming up their own version of Britain's history with a committee?

Whilst there have indeed been immigrants who made good in Britain and to the benefit of Britain. It is often the case that some immigrants will prosper, also evidenced throughout the past plus recently the USA, Canada, Australia etc. However, there are far larger numbers who have been the polar opposite. Since WWII immigration has included many who have been violent law breakers. The percentage of violent crimes amongst specific ethnic groups is many, many times that of the main population. Those groups also represent around a half of those in jail/convicted. The same applies to some groups that have a constant predilection to fraud as their main and only occupation.
Recent genetic studies of Neolithic Britain, show that the farmers did move and in colonize in Britain (and the rest of Europe). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_European_Farmers as opposed to the indigenous populations adopting farming.

As for more recent immigrants, I know that in the US, immigrants commit crime at lower rates than the native born. In any case, vast majority immigrants and native-born don't commit violent crimes. The key variable for violent crime is gender, with men committing crimes at about x10 the rate of women. Even so, most men don't commit violent crimes.

The economy of the UK is very much a service economy. Immigrants with their connections to their homelands, are key part of the UK economy. It took Donald Trump less than a year to cause a recession in the US economy by disrupting trade and immigration. The UK is even more dependent on trade and immigration.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom