Send UK illegals to America!

Uncle Gizmo

Nifty Access Guy
Staff member
Local time
Today, 08:23
Joined
Jul 9, 2003
Messages
17,586
It appears that the Venezuelan government is sending their criminals to America.

The UK is currently in talks with Rwanda to send our illegal immigrants there...


When I saw this below I thought, the UK could copy Venezuela and do the same, package up our illegal immigrants and drop them off on the American border! In Canada maybe then the immigrants would have a choice of country!


Post-edited to add more context for people not in the know....
 
Last edited:
It appears that the Venezuelan government is sending their criminals to America.

The UK is currently in talks with Rwanda to send our illegal immigrants there...


When I saw this below I thought, the UK could copy Venezuela and do the same, package up our illegal immigrants and drop them off on the American border! In Canada maybe then the immigrants would have a choice of country!


Post-edited to add more context for people not in the know....

And oh my goodness, but where o where did this migrant with virtually no identification or credentials get a firearm in a city that supposedly has excellent gun control laws???

Any gun control advocates care to explain this one
 
We can't forget that Australia was once a place where undesirables were sent. Problem is, we are running out of islands.
The Earth is "full". in the old days, prior to around 1920 it was common to force massive population relocations. Evidently in the period of 1970 through 1971 (Black September) Jordan took aggressive action against Palestinians in Jordan. The Palestinians then (forced) relocated to Lebanon. That migration then resulted in a civil war there which destabilized Lebanon. (Why aren't the pro-Palestinian protestors complaining about Jordan's ethnic cleansing too.) Where can we force the population of Gaza to relocate to today so that they don't pose a threat to Israel?
 
Last edited:
And oh my goodness, but where o where did this migrant with virtually no identification or credentials get a firearm in a city that supposedly has excellent gun control laws???

Any gun control advocates care to explain this one
I hear crickets. If he is part of organized crime of any kind, they can obtain the guns through their organization. They can also steal them from law abiding citizens. Check the serial numbers for possible registration if present. It's a good question though.
 
I hear crickets. If he is part of organized crime of any kind, they can obtain the guns through their organization. They can also steal them from law abiding citizens. Check the serial numbers for possible registration if present. It's a good question though.
Exactly... The criminals will always have a way to get them so gun control laws mostly just affect the good people
 
Part of the problem is they don't enforce current laws, instead they write new laws they will not enforce.
 
If we can just pass one more new law, it will fix everything
And most importantly, if we can spend another billion dollars - now THAT will be the magic bullet that solves the problem once and for all!

Typical Democrat mental illness, a way of thinking that has sparse creativity.
 
I understand that the democrats want to bring illegals in to the USA because there is a high chance they will vote democrat.

It puzzled me as to why they don't vet these immigrants and filter out the criminal ones at the border.

Then I wondered, is that their intention?

The democrats want to undermine the police force making it easier for criminals to commit crimes without consequence.

A significant increase in the number of people who are willing to commit crimes will result in an increase in crime.

Is that their goal?

When crime becomes a nationwide problem then they can bring in surveillance cameras to every aspect of American life and take total control over its people.
 
understand that the democrats want to bring illegals in to the USA because there is a high chance they will vote democrat.
I don't subscribe to that theory. As you have pointed out, it makes no sense. I think though, it gives the appearance of a benevolent governing body who is willing to take care of it's people - even if the "care" is not earned. It is THAT perception that will make the demographic the Democrap party caters to vote accordingly.
 
I understand that the democrats want to bring illegals in to the USA because there is a high chance they will vote democrat.

It puzzled me as to why they don't vet these immigrants and filter out the criminal ones at the border.

Then I wondered, is that their intention?

The democrats want to undermine the police force making it easier for criminals to commit crimes without consequence.

A significant increase in the number of people who are willing to commit crimes will result in an increase in crime.

Is that their goal?

When crime becomes a nationwide problem then they can bring in surveillance cameras to every aspect of American life and take total control over its people.

To me the advantage in voting is clear, although illegals cannot vote, that does not mean that there is zero benefit to bringing them for votes.
I as illegal Pancho may not vote, but my niece and nephews who are citizens here are going to be sympathetic to whichever party was sympathetic to me. It definitely translates to votes, just not specifically by the illegals. At least, until we give them amnesty, which eventually we'll have to once they're here long enough, just like DACA's. So yeah - that theory has a lot of weight IMO. Doesn't matter that illegals technically cannot vote.

I personally know plenty of Mexican citizens who vote Democrat mostly because of the immigration issue.
 
All the more reason to not allow people on the dole to vote. They will always vote for the free stuff.
You appear to think that people on the dole are 'scroungers'. That view is blinkered because hard working people may find themselves out of work for many reasons like redundancy, illness etc etc. Yes, I agree some are scroungers but it's not fair to lump out of work people together like you appear to.
Also, I thought most people in the USA (over voting age) have a right to vote irrespective of social status. Isn't that their right to vote? Next, you'll be saying certain ethnic groups shouldn't vote. You display an excellent example of 'the land of the free' - with exceptions of course.
Maybe you should exclude disabled people on benefits. After all, they are scrounging off the state
Is your view indicative of the middle class Americans? I think your view of excluding certain groups is rather Dickensian. I suggest you move into at least the 20th century. The 21st century maybe to big a leap for you.
Col
 
Last edited:
No. Just saying that they shouldn't have a say in how the government gets to spend my money. I didn't say I wasn't willing to give a hand up.
So how do you distinguish between genuine dole people who have fallen on hard times not of their making, and excluding scroungers from voting.
Doesn't every genuine US citizen have the right to vote if eligible? I'm guessing it's in the comic you call 'the constitution ' if so, you're proposing changing the rules of your democracy.
Here's a thought, why not exclude women from voting too. After all they should be raising kids properly to avoid them smashing up congress
Col
 
Why do I have to distinguish? If I have to draw a line, then if you're on the dole for more than 6 months the previous year, you don't get to vote this year. It isn't a permanent thing. Duh!
Ah, got it. You want to stop all dole people from voting if they fit your criteria even if it goes against their human rights and voting eligibility.
So how about those on long term disability benefit? They are the same as innocent dole people, just a different kind of benefit. You can't exclude one type and not a similar recipient of benefits. Or doesn't that apply in your mind. Duh! (Whatever that means)
Col
 
Yes we have delivery firms here that deliver McDonald's or KFC, chinese or Indian meals, also -

You should use the self service checkouts, much quicker to scan your items yourself, no queue and pay by card or cash. It would save you money by not having to pay for other people's groceries in the queue for the checkout girl.
Col
 
Last edited:
So how do you distinguish between genuine dole people who have fallen on hard times not of their making, and excluding scroungers from voting.
Doesn't every genuine US citizen have the right to vote if eligible? I'm guessing it's in the comic you call 'the constitution ' if so, you're proposing changing the rules of your democracy.
Here's a thought, why not exclude women from voting too. After all they should be raising kids properly to avoid them smashing up congress
Col

Here's a thought, why not spend some time here and get to know the people who are on the dole. Then you'll know what we know rather than continually wondering out loud. There should be a limit to government handouts that hard working people are paying for. Our country has gone too far in one direction, it needs to be reigned in.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom