Doc, I remember the first time I decided to go and stand in a long line waiting to buy tickets for
E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial. I had read a digest of the film in a magazine titled "The movie that made millions of American cry". So many years have passed from that day and I've watched this movie more than 10 times since then and I've not been able to stop my tears each time I watched it. This is the power of the story, the power of the cast and above all the power of the director. You sit in front of a screen. You know everything is fiction. You know all you will watch is impossible. But once the light goes off and the show starts, the director and the cast pull you into the story, into the plot. You forget who you are, where you are and the whole thing is just a made up story. Then the light comes back on and you feel your eyes are wet.
You know nobody can bring back the dinosaurs, but while you're watching
Jurassic Park you don't think you are following a %100 fiction story. It's the power of the cast and the one who is putting it all together, the director.
Nor can we forget that if you give an actor a lousy script, not even Charleton Heston could make it work.
I don't expect all actors being able to act like
Morgan Freeman in
Driving Miss Daisy or
The Shawshank Redemption but then, when they fail to be perfect, it's where the director counts. Don't forget that
Steven Spielberg normally uses unknown or little knows actors. Because he doesn't want the audience have a per-impression of the act. He tries to start fresh to be able to manipulate the audience , to take them where he wants. He could use a lot of famous actors for playing Hooper in
Jaws but he chose
Richard Dreyfuss, a very little and new one. Later he chose him to play in
Close Encounters of the Third Kind.
So, when a director wants to use a One-Man-Army actor (Arnold, The Rock, Stallone ...) into an emotional film, he should be prepared. Because he has to put more efforts to change what the audience may have expected to see and show them the other side of the coin.
Not that I'm against Arnold as an actor, but I think if he can't perform what he's expected, the director should fill the holes. Arnold was very good in
The Terminator (the first part), because
James Cameron knows his job. But as soon as he quits directing the next parts, Arnold's performance on the scene is not impressive.