The main problem I have found is that the politicians try to do too much to justify their jobs.
I for one would be happy to pay them just to sit at home. This seems to work very well in agriculture and other areas.
Interesting take. Never thought of it that way, but in the realm of office politics that is what people (bootlickers) do in order to attempt to keep their jobs (for some even though they know they are on their way out).
One way to tell the Republicans from the Democrats is by their views on the military.
The Republicans want low military spending and a small standing army but they want to send it everywhere. The Democrats what high military spending and a large standing army but they don't want to send it anywhere.
One way to tell the Republicans from the Democrats is by their views on the military.
The Republicans want low military spending and a small standing army but they want to send it everywhere. The Democrats what high military spending and a large standing army but they don't want to send it anywhere.
You forgot one: the independents want low military spending, a small standing army, and they don't want it to go anywhere unless all other efforts at diplomacy have completely failed.
There were not many names I could call career politions that would get past the censors so I selected "Bum". Bums in the sense I was using it are leaches on society. They make no useful contribution but stand in line for handouts.
As usual, this thread took a turn somewhere into partisian bickering. The point is - no matter what side of the political spectrum you are on - change is necessary. We cannot continue the way we are going. The only way to convince congress that we are serious is to upset the incumbents.