Trump Administration Predictions (3 Viewers)

[Pat Hartman]

That's a surprise, the Great Deceiver doesn't follow the teachings of Christ.

He's more of an old testament kinda' guy.

Capitalism was behind the inflation.

And somehow the rest of us think it was due to the stimulus checks and the artificially forced inflation in the cost of transportation. We won't even discuss the arbitrary killing of millions of egg laying chickens which sent the price of eggs and every food item that contains them spiraling out of control.

 

[Pat Hartman]

If, for example, i heard Biden trying to get the Georgia guy to fake the count, I might be a little less inclined to forget.

You don't even know what you heard. You're joshing us. English is not your native language.

 

[Pat Hartman]

In Israel, non-Orthodox Jews are not free to practice their religion. Their rabbis cannot perform marriages, in country that has no civil marriage.

I wonder how Catholics and Muslims get married then. You seem to have a great hatred for Israel which is a somewhat perverted version of antisemitism. You don't hate Jews. You hate Zionists. Hitler killed Jews because they were Jews. Funny but that is exactly why Muslim extremists kill Jews. Hitler was in cahoots with the Muslim leaders in the Middle East during WWII. They were discussing how the "final solution" could be implemented in the Arab nations of the area.

If Hamas won't stop bombing innocent Israeli citizens until all the Jews are dead and the land between the river and the sea is cleansed of Jews, why is that not considered ethnic cleansing? The Israelis are committed to killing members of Hamas. They are perfectly OK with being neighbors with people who are not trying every day to kill them. Not all Palestinians support Hamas. No one is trying to kill all Palestinians so Israel is NOT committed to ethnic cleansing or you don't know what that actually means. It is Islam that pursues ethnic cleansing. Don't ever loose sight of the fact that NO Muslim country will accept Palestinian refugees. They've all learned their lessons from the behavior of the past waves of Palestinians. Although the French seem to have stepped up to the plate. I guess they don't already have their hands full with the North African Muslims they imported to do their grunt work.

 

[Thales750]

You don't even know what you heard. You're joshing us. English is not your native language.

What i heard was New York Gangster speech, coercion. you can't hear it. All you cab hear is what reinforces your world view. It's scientific.

 

[Pat Hartman]

What i heard was New York Gangster speech, coercion. you can't hear it. All you cab hear is what reinforces your world view. It's scientific.

That's due to your TDS. The rest of us heard a different request. It wasn't an order to change the numbers.

 

[moke123]

The rest of us heard a different request. It wasn't an order to change the numbers.

As part of the "rest of us", don't put words in our mouths.

Here's a reminder

 

[The_Doc_Man]

I recall that corporations have been greedy for a long time, so the concept of greed-driven inflation lacks explanatory power.

Thank you, Roger. I also remember this issue a lot farther back than suggested by Thales750.

 

[Pat Hartman]

Let's start with - Doxing Republicans or Trump supporters or ICE agents, even Supreme Court Justices is OK but Doxing people who disagree with Trump is not OK. I personally think that Doxing should be a crime regardless of who is the victim of the doxing. It is very dangerous since the crazies take advantage of the information and threaten people. Some might actually take action rather than just threaten. I am not a loon so even if I knew Lindsay Graham's personal phone number and actual address, I would never harass him but others would. So, I don't even want that bag of crap doxed. I would however love to see him lose his seat to a Republican challenger.

This is water under the bridge and the Democrats are finally now learning how much of a mistake cheating in 2020 turned out to be. Trump's second term would have been very much a continuation of his first term. Trump was in no way prepared for the criminality of the deep state and the fecklessness of the elected Republicans, especially the fecklessness of the elected Republicans like Mitch McConnel and all three of the Republican Speakers Trump has had to work with. But you all gave him four years to prepare and DJT didn't sit back and play the victim. He rounded up a reliable staff that was in place on day 1. He is far more dangerous to the Democrat's "democracy" (that's democracy with a small d) now than he ever would have been had the Dems not cheated in 2020. In 2020 there were many problems with the counts in various Georgia counties and in multiple other states also. Unverified signatures, scanning the same ballots multiple times, baring observers from observing among other crimes, counting ballots received after election day, etc. Trump was not asking for anything to be changed. He was asking for honesty which he never got.

There is no reason to litigate 2020 again. Biden won but he won by cheating. Trump went away quietly but he went to work to overcome the deep state and he is making progress. Now all he has to do is to somehow figure out how to get rid of people like Lindsay Graham without losing the seat to a Democrat.

 

[Mike Krailo]

Now all he has to do is to somehow figure out how to get rid of people like Lindsay Graham without losing the seat to a Democrat.

Things have gotten much more complicated for Trump if what he has been saying lately is for real. The Epstein case suppression is beyond scandalous and he has no excuse to not make good on his promise on something so simple. He's going to crash and burn if he doesn't take it more seriously. The whole thing reeks to high heaven IMO.

 

[Isaac]

Opinion | The Fourth Amendment is on life support — and we’re all paying the price

White House “border czar” Tom Homan said the quiet part out loud on ICE detentions — and we should all take it as a warning.

www.msnbc.com

Pretty good summary of the immigration situation, what ICE agents are doing based solely on racial makeup is absolutely awful, wrong and unconstitutional, and I hope judges continue to step in until they are forced to start obeying the law.

 

[AccessBlaster]

If it weren’t for self-inflicted problems, he probably wouldn’t have any problems at all, most of which are preventable.

 

[Pat Hartman]

Pretty good summary of the immigration situation,

Always look for the "purple" words and omissions of facts and mis-direction when reading any "news" article especially from places known for their bias such as MSNBC. For example, the anecdote of the black man in Miami Gardens has nothing to do with ICE. It has to do with the local police. If the man hangs around street corners the way drug dealers do, that is reasonable suspicion and the local police are going to question him. Funny how they don't give you an ICE example. Ask yourself why. Then ask yourself why you were not discriminating enough to notice the irrelevant example. Given the outright lies pushed out by most media outlets, the task of discrimination falls heavily on the reader. Can you determine the bias of the author? If you can, you need to find the same "news" report elsewhere and compare the facts as presented to see if they coincide. If I know from the first paragraph what the author thinks about a topic, I know I am reading an opinion piece and not a news article and stop reading further. Since the author has already made up his mind, he has filtered out facts that contradict his opinions. So instead of taking all day to read the NYT Sunday edition, I can get through it in a half hour. Although I haven't read it for years since I won't pay a penny for their biased reports. I do occasionally find it laying around at a bridge tournament or hotel lobby. Most of the time, I can't even get past the first page which is now where their opinions are presented.

ICE has now and has always has had detention facilities around the country where people in the country illegally are detained until they can be deported. In the past, illegal immigrants were mostly from Mexico and Central America so "race" was an obvious visual clue. These days, the criminals come from hundreds of different countries but the majority are still of Hispanic descent. Think about it this way - plane hijackers are usually young men and frequently of Arab descent. And yet, TSA does not "discriminate" and so harasses grandmothers who are the least likely hijackers and gives the most likely culprits a light touch so as to not offend them. Does that make you feel safer when you fly? I like the Israeli view. Profile and target the most likely culprits. Leave the grandmothers and people with children alone UNLESS they are showing signs of nervousness, etc. That's where the profiling becomes important.

PS, at least in Florida, the people rounded up by ICE are given the option to self deport (on our dime) rather than spend even a minute in Allegator Alcatraz.

"purple" words are negative in context and usually an assumption not based on facts in evidence.

 

[Steve R.]

Opinion | The Fourth Amendment is on life support — and we’re all paying the price

White House “border czar” Tom Homan said the quiet part out loud on ICE detentions — and we should all take it as a warning.

www.msnbc.com

Pretty good summary of the immigration situation, what ICE agents are doing based solely on racial makeup is absolutely awful, wrong and unconstitutional, and I hope judges continue to step in until they are forced to start obeying the law.

You have this backwards. The Democrats, are the racists, and they have been illegally importing people based on skin color. Now it comes time to deport. So who should law enforcement look for?
White women over 70? Of course not.
You look for the people that meet the criteria of the crime. Those who illegally entered this country. If they happen to be 100% of a minority group, that is not racist. Those are the people who illegally entered the country and who should be deported.

 

[moke123]

Opinion | The Fourth Amendment is on life support — and we’re all paying the price

White House “border czar” Tom Homan said the quiet part out loud on ICE detentions — and we should all take it as a warning.

www.msnbc.com

Pretty good summary of the immigration situation, what ICE agents are doing based solely on racial makeup is absolutely awful, wrong and unconstitutional, and I hope judges continue to step in until they are forced to start obeying the law.

more stories everyday.

Army veteran and US citizen arrested in California immigration raid warns it could happen to anyone

A U.S. Army veteran arrested during an immigration raid at a California marijuana farm says he was sprayed with tear gas and pepper spray before being dragged from his vehicle on his way to work.

apnews.com

US citizen arrested during Ice raid in what family describes as ‘kidnapping’

Andrea Velez, 32, a graduate of Cal Poly Pomona, had just been dropped off at work by her mother and sister

www.theguardian.com

U.S. citizen detained for 10 days by immigration officials may not have known what he was signing - AZPM

www.azpm.org

This story below hits home as my wife did not learn that she was not an american citizen until she was in her 30's. When her parents came here from germany my mother in law went into labor with my wifes sister as the ship arrived in NJ. She was born here and is a citizen ( if trump doesn't get his way.) When my wife was born a year later her mother was visiting germany and my wife had a german birth certificate. All her life my wife had a US passport, a social security number, etc. When we married she went to change her social security card and they informed her she was not a citizen. Her parents apparently messed up by not including her on their paperwork when they became citizens. It took her 5-6 years to get her citizenship straightened out.

Thousands of adoptees were never given US citizenship. Now they risk deportation

Between 30,000 and 70,000 children adopted by American families from other countries never became U.S. citizens, according to the Adoptee Rights Campaign.

www.kpbs.org

 

[Pat Hartman]

So, moke, by your logic, ICE should not exist because no one should ever be deported because they might not even know they are not citizens?

The Democrats caused this s***show by opening our borders and telling the world to come on in the water's fine and there's lots of free stuff. And since the "sanctuary" cities refuse to cooperate with ICE, it is hard for them to pick up detainees as they are released which of course would be the ideal situation. But the "sanctuary" cities insist on protecting criminals and so innocents get put in danger. Sounds like a plan to me. But what kind of idiot would make such a plan?

This is essentially the same tactic used by the terrorist group Hamas. If you hide behind women and children, the Israelis can't shoot you and if they do, they kill innocents and so look bad in the eyes of the world. Is that what the "sanctuary" cities think? If they protect criminals, ICE won't go after them in a situation where they might put innocents in danger?

 

[moke123]

So, moke, by your logic, ICE should not exist because no one should ever be deported because they might not even know they are not citizens?

Where the F**k do you get these ideas? Your Daughters should be concerned.

 

[Pat Hartman]

If the "sanctuary" cities persist in protecting criminals above citizens, how is ICE to collect the criminals without going into homes and workplaces? Aren't they forcing ICE to endanger innocents by this practice? This is essentially the same tactic that Hamas uses to keep Israel from shooting the terrorists. But, as you can see, it doesn't work in either case. No matter what the criminals/terrorists use for "sanctuary", the good guys have to take them off the streets.

So, exactly how is ICE supposed to find the bad guys without going into work places or neighborhoods or Home Depot parking lots where they congregate when the cities insist on protecting the criminals?

 

[Isaac]

You have this backwards. The Democrats, are the racists, and they have been illegally importing people based on skin color. Now it comes time to deport. So who should law enforcement look for?
White women over 70? Of course not.
You look for the people that meet the criteria of the crime. Those who illegally entered this country. If they happen to be 100% of a minority group, that is not racist. Those are the people who illegally entered the country and who should be deported.

No that's completely illegal and unconstitutional and has been for many years. Where does it stop Steve? How about we arrest everybody with flat brim caps because they're likely to be punk criminals

It would be one thing if they were just being momentarily detained. But that's not what's happening. Hundreds of them are being detained with extremely extremely limited access to family and lawyers while they frantically try to prove their documents, I'm referring here to the ones who are legal but are caught up in the mix which is tons of them. How would you like it if your wife was just disappeared in the middle of the night and it took you a week to work out the visitation until you could show the correct documents? Would you think that that was okay? Normally a person would not think that was okay.

Trump is going to lose that treasured chunk of Hispanic votes but he doesn't seem to be smart enough to see it

 

[Steve R.]

No that's completely illegal and unconstitutional and has been for many years. Where does it stop Steve?

Again, it started with Biden's racist program to import illegal immigrants. That was completely illegal and unconstitutional, yet - unbelievably - it was allowed!!! You may argue that two wrongs don't become a right, but at a certain point you do have to act to protect society to rectify the original wrong.

How about we arrest everybody with flat brim caps because they're likely to be punk criminals

To arrest people, you need a description of that person. Many people may, by accident, meet that criteria. After being detained, the police must then interview everyone in an attempt to ascertain who the criminal is.

If you carry your argument to an absurd level, it would become illegal for the police to even obtain a description of the criminal (because they might arrest the wrong person(s)). Given that, it would then become impossible for the police to arrest anyone. The criminal gets away.

I would suggest that you read: Full text of "Harrison Bergeron" here. A humorous short story that exposing the stupidity of making everything in society equal.