The main point of government is improving our standard of living.
The progressive liberal government does this by robbing those who are willing to work for a living, skimming the top to pay the politicians, and giving the dregs to the folks on the dole. The problem with redistributing the proceeds of a "progressive income tax" is that it is zero sum game. Further, it parallels predictions from the laws of thermodynamics. I'll simplify them by using the lyrics from "Scarecrow and the Crows' Song" from
The Wiz. In the most basic terms, "You can't win; you can't break even; and you can't get out of the game."
Taxation does not create wealth. It just transfers it. Because there is the overhead of paying the people doing the transference, the taxes don't go entirely to the proposed beneficiaries, so it is
analogous to an engine with a frictional component leading to inevitable output losses. I'm not saying "identical to", just "has some striking similarities."
Trump's tariffs are bringing in some money, but more important, they are removing some of the channels whereby we were paying excessive overhead for low-balled imports. If there is ANY similarity between "greasing the gears of the economy" and the laws of Thermodynamics, it is that you get the least loss by reducing the friction of the gears. Back to economic terms, reduce taxes and reduce the overhead. Then the money you generate suffers the least diversion.
I doubt Thomas Jefferson thought about thermodynamic and economic analogs, but he DID say that the government that governs least governs best. The best policy to improve the standard of living is for the government to return SELF-RESPONSIBILITY to the people. Do we need laws? Yes. Do we need as many laws as we have? No. President Trump's rules (actually, his rules on rules) are aligned towards removing the myriad regulations that plague the USA. Don't know if he made it official, but he said he would require removal of 10 old rules for each new rule that any department proposed. I'm good with that.