I have a split Access 2007 db (actually an 2003 mdb viewed in 2007). The BE is located on a server and the FE is copied on each user's hard drive.
I have bitmap images of each user's signature which are stored in a folder on the server where the BE is. The location is stored on a field in the user table; there are 8 records (so 8 images) and this doesn't change or increase.
I have these records linked to other tables (records of services rendered) and the images are meant to be viewed on the data entry forms and subsequent reports through an image control.
For some reason, when we use this configuration, the performance of the database become extremely slow and may even come grinding to a halt--stuck. Since there are so few images involved and the images are not large, I am not sure why this is happening. It seemed like a nice idea to have an electronic signature for each record.
I tried other methods of improving the performance (like a bound phantom form which remains open whenever the database is open). It seems to be the signature configuration.
I should also add that this doesn't seem to occur for me--but I am in a completely different location than the actual db users, using a different server--although the basic setup is the same. The actual users are the ones reporting the problem. Could it be a server issue?
Would this configuration strongly impact the performace of the database? Any ideas how to fix?
Thanks!
Paul
I have bitmap images of each user's signature which are stored in a folder on the server where the BE is. The location is stored on a field in the user table; there are 8 records (so 8 images) and this doesn't change or increase.
I have these records linked to other tables (records of services rendered) and the images are meant to be viewed on the data entry forms and subsequent reports through an image control.
For some reason, when we use this configuration, the performance of the database become extremely slow and may even come grinding to a halt--stuck. Since there are so few images involved and the images are not large, I am not sure why this is happening. It seemed like a nice idea to have an electronic signature for each record.
I tried other methods of improving the performance (like a bound phantom form which remains open whenever the database is open). It seems to be the signature configuration.
I should also add that this doesn't seem to occur for me--but I am in a completely different location than the actual db users, using a different server--although the basic setup is the same. The actual users are the ones reporting the problem. Could it be a server issue?
Would this configuration strongly impact the performace of the database? Any ideas how to fix?
Thanks!
Paul
Last edited: