R
Rich
Guest
It's torture reading some of his postsColinEssex said:Torture can take many forms jj![]()
Col

It's torture reading some of his postsColinEssex said:Torture can take many forms jj![]()
Col
It’s OK Rich, it must be really hard to live your whole life (64 years) and discover everything you thought you knew is pure BS.Rich said:It's torture reading some of his posts![]()
jsanders said:It’s OK Rich, it must be really hard to live your whole life (64 years) and discover everything you thought you knew is pure BS.
.
Year of the Tig, I honestly cannot figure out why you would literally edit my comments to make it appear I stated exactly the opposite of what I did. I couldn't have been more clear that I do not think the rights of a criminal are more important than innocent millions. If you are going to continue this behavior of misrepresenting other people's opinions, especially my own, then I see no point in engaging in conversation with you.Year of the Tig said:Kraj, you make reference to 'one criminal's rights more important than the lives of innocent millions'. How many millions have terrorists killed? We are in danger of being swayed by political propaganda by using such hyperbolic language. It is what 'they' want. A terrified populace willing to hand more and more power and control to them.
Where did he say that?Kraj said:Especially when you make reference to 'What we need is Tax cuts to benefit the very wealthy'.![]()
My point exactly.Rich said:Where did he say that?![]()
Kraj said:Year of the Tig, I honestly cannot figure out why you would literally edit my comments to make it appear I stated exactly the opposite of what I did. I couldn't have been more clear that I do not think the rights of a criminal are more important than innocent millions. If you are going to continue this behavior of misrepresenting other people's opinions, especially my own, then I see no point in engaging in conversation with you.
Especially when you make reference to 'What we need is Tax cuts to benefit the very wealthy'.![]()
Accepted. And I apologize for overreacting. I'm afraid this place sometimes brings out the worst in me.Year of the Tig said:Kraj, just went back and had a look - and I cannot imagine why I did that since it is perfectly clear what you mean in the original post. Partly I was agreeing with you then lost track after reading someone else's post.
My apologies!
Year of the Tig said:Kraj, just went back and had a look - and I cannot imagine why I did that since it is perfectly clear what you mean in the original post. Partly I was agreeing with you then lost track after reading someone else's post.
My apologies!
I almost forgot to mention.... did you just say Chinks? Seriously?Rich said:If it does it'll have nothing to do with the Chinks or Indians or Saudis, it'll be due to the lack of natural resources, especially fuel
Kraj said:I almost forgot to mention.... did you just say Chinks? Seriously?
It's just a euphemism, no different to being called a LimeyKraj said:I almost forgot to mention.... did you just say Chinks? Seriously?
Kraj said:I'd like to believe that word isn't an offensive racial slur in the UK...
Give it up Josey, you're on another loserjsanders said:You know Kraj,
A leopard can’t change his spots.
All this time he’s been a closet conservative.
Fair enough. Since it is here, it kinda caught me by suprise.Rich said:[...] it's not a term that's seen as offensive here.
we had a chinky last nightRich said:I've made no secret of the fact here that I regularly visit the Chinky for a takeaway, and so do a great many other Brits it's not a term that's seen as offensive here.
Of course if I was going for a curry and said I was going to a Paki that would be offensive, so I don't.