- Local time
- Yesterday, 21:50
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2001
- Messages
- 30,566
Adam, FYI, Isaac has said he disagrees with me about religion but respects my civility.
When you post a long, syntactically awkward, and factually incorrect post like that, particularly one that borders on a rant that is transparent for all to see, I have no interest in responding. You are like the gong banging slowly but signifying nothing.
Addendum: Your response to Darrell's "delusion" comment bears examination. With thanks and acknowledgment to Wikipedia.ORG...
According to the 1913 book General Psychopathology, a belief is delusional based on three conditions:
1. Certainty of the belief, i.e. a belief held with absolution conviction
2. Incorrigibility of the belief, i.e. not changed even with presentation of compelling counterargument or proof of the contrary position
3. Falsity of the belief, i.e. the belief is either impossible or is excessively bizarre or can be seen as untrue
The only difference between Christianity and delusion is that neither theists nor atheists can prove their position, so #3 is pending proof by either side. You would have to admit that you qualify for #1. Based on previous discussions, I would think you qualify for #2. If you wish to review the counterarguments, I invite you to look into the "Are You an Atheist?" thread. TONS of food for thought there - but based on #1, you probably would avoid it so you wouldn't have to struggle to hold on to your beliefs quite so hard.
When you post a long, syntactically awkward, and factually incorrect post like that, particularly one that borders on a rant that is transparent for all to see, I have no interest in responding. You are like the gong banging slowly but signifying nothing.
Addendum: Your response to Darrell's "delusion" comment bears examination. With thanks and acknowledgment to Wikipedia.ORG...
According to the 1913 book General Psychopathology, a belief is delusional based on three conditions:
1. Certainty of the belief, i.e. a belief held with absolution conviction
2. Incorrigibility of the belief, i.e. not changed even with presentation of compelling counterargument or proof of the contrary position
3. Falsity of the belief, i.e. the belief is either impossible or is excessively bizarre or can be seen as untrue
The only difference between Christianity and delusion is that neither theists nor atheists can prove their position, so #3 is pending proof by either side. You would have to admit that you qualify for #1. Based on previous discussions, I would think you qualify for #2. If you wish to review the counterarguments, I invite you to look into the "Are You an Atheist?" thread. TONS of food for thought there - but based on #1, you probably would avoid it so you wouldn't have to struggle to hold on to your beliefs quite so hard.
Last edited: