Are the books better than the film's? I just didn't get the film's.....
You have to be able to immerse yourself in what is commonly called "the suspension of disbelief." Professor Tolkien wrote fantasy stories for his son with a backdrop of war against what seemed to be an implacable enemy. But don't look for specific parallels because there weren't any to be found. Tolkien made it clear that you wouldn't find any specific analogs to political or military individuals from the journalist's headlines.
Everybody has a threshold of imagination. Were you a fan of Edgar Rice Burroughs? Did the Tarzan or Barsoom series catch your interest? Or how about The Three Musketeers? In the latter genre, there is also The Count of Monte Cristo. Or what about stories of Dracula? Bram Stoker pretty much set the standard and the movies that claim to tell "the true story" can be found, though for me the BEST adaptation was one that is hard to find now - with Louis Jordan as chief bloodsucker, made-for-TV and aired on PBS (national educational TV network). Did you enjoy the Harry Potter films, which were well-adapted from the printed stories? How about the James Bond novels and films? To me, the movie Thunderball (Sean Connery) was closest I had ever seen to a source novel. Scene for scene, it matched up.
I guess the main question is, how much of reality are you willing to release for enjoyment - for total immersion into the other world that the book's portal exposes to you? Can you
ever get into another book to let your imagination soar along with others who enjoyed the story and the world behind it? Is there any genre of fiction where you CAN immerse yourself within another story?
Uncle G, it will always be a matter of whether you "connect" with the story. That can be a matter of the writer's style as well as the chosen subject matter and environment. To me, the LOTR film trilogy brought tears to my eyes several times as Peter Jackson captured certain important scenes to near perfection. The story of a group of young, innocent friends with limited - sometimes even isolated - life experience suddenly going off to war against a truly frightening foe is the perfect backdrop for a study in the meaning of bravery and adherence to duty. The aftermath of that war is even included as the lead character Frodo tries to adapt to life back in his home village after having come home with his physical wounds healed but his psyche forever scarred, forever a victim of a type of trauma we would now call PTSD.
To more directly answer your original question: I REALLY liked the Lord of the Rings movie trilogy and, for that matter, I liked The Hobbit trilogy (though LOTR felt less "forced" than the Hobbit.) Peter Jackson had some great movies under his belt, but that was, to me, his crown jewel. LOTR is a relatively faithful adaptation, though some minor scenes were removed from the novel - because watching the LOTR trilogy is over nine hours of your time as it is. The books are more detailed in some cases, but the big-screen visuals, in my opinion, do great justice to the underlying printed material.