Your reply was the deflection. My answer was directly related to your statement that you think judges are being impartial. So if you think that, then you will agree that Mar-a-Lago is worth $18M, just like judge Arthur Engoron says, right? If you think it is worth more than $18M then it would suggest that the judge is indeed not impartial and your whole argument based on judge impartiality collapses.
Hamsandwichism
It's a commercial property. The $18 to 26 million valuation is from the Palm Beach County Assessor, not the judge. The same guy who did the valuation on my place in palm beach county. M-A-L is valued on the income it produces. Trump in 1995 signed a deed of conservation and preservation easement, which means he ceded the right to use the property for anything other than a social club.
I think you are saying that if he sold M-A-L it would only go for something in that range, is that what you believe?
I see that you have passed deflection 101. It's not about comparing it to something else. As far as Trump in concerned, he was indicted because a grand jury looked at the evidence and voted to indict. Trumps strategy is to delay the federal trials till after the election, hoping that he will win., then he can make the federal trials go away. It's a crap shoot for him. Selecting supreme court justices have always been political here, for as far back as I can remember. Nixon stacked the court as well as some Democratic Presidents (Clinton may have done so as well). That is the way it works here. Confirmatiom hearings always get snooty regardles of which party is in power. But, that process has absolutely nothing to do with the crimes that Trump is accuesd of. When we declared independence from George 3rd, the founders did not want to have a king that was above the law. 44 presidents in a row relenquished power based on the results of an election. The only exception is Trump, who keeps lying about the election. Only one other President, beside Trump broke the law that was probably going to be tried, Nixon, and he accepted a pardon fom Gerald Ford. If Presidential immunity exists, why did Nixon use it? No other president hoarded classified documents and refused to return them. Only Trump. No other President tried to strong arm local election officials. Only Trump.
*Cough, Biden *Cough. I know he was only vice-president but that's even worse because he has no authority to remove from the SCIF. He obviously gave them back because he had no authority to have them!
We know that they will complain about that because they did so in 2016 too
I do not agree. Are you implying that Trump has not broken any laws?
I believe this is a technicality designed to slow the juggernaut that is Donald Trump.
Do you think that range is realistic for the value of M-A-L, irrespective of who says what?
If you don't care about the value of real estate, you don't care about what the whole Trump case is based upon. It is up to the judge to decide on what the resale value of the property is, not the assessor. You still don't say if you agree with the assessors valuation and we all know why.
Hillary broke laws. Was she prosecuted?
That linked article also said this:
Comey - someone who leaked negative information about Trump and acknowledged despising him - was hardly nonpartisan. But people will believe anything to reinforce their political bias. Consequently, he brings zero credibility to that decision.
