Trump Administration Predictions (3 Viewers)

Not only with AB. Fauci's credibility is :poop: right now because of his exaggerations and deflections. He was/is an alarmist: pure, plain, and simple.
And, all the extrapolation by the the entire conservative cool aid drinking tribe has not? You guys no longer are capable of seeing the disjunction of your belief system.
 
Was this the lawsuit regarding CBS' manipulation of the Harris interview where they allowed her to restate her answers when they were word-salad? Seems like election interference to me. The public is supposed to see the candidates as they are, not manipulated to look intelligent. CBS presents itself to the world as real news and this proves that they are no such thing. Why should YOU as a concerned voter not be questioning the ethics of 60 minutes? Instead you make it sound like Trump is overstepping. Why is Trump the bad guy for bringing the lawsuit? Why do you say that CBS is attempting to appease Trump rather than clean up their act? Your summary is totally twisted logic and a complete misstatement of the underlying facts of the story.
So that gives the Dictator @ 1600 the right to have the state control them? That is a job for Justice, or the civil courts, not the wanna be God of the world.

You are practicing hypocrisy, as usual.
 
Fauci misled the public about his involvement in gain-of-function research at Wuhan, undermining trust in science and damaging the credibility of researchers around the world by promoting flawed data.
Only to coo aid drinkers that are used to being brainwashed into thinking in broad strokes. That's why y,all are so easy to manipulate. All someone has to do is use the language style you respond to positively and they are speaking the gospel
 
Only to coo aid drinkers that are used to being brainwashed into thinking in broad strokes. That's why y,all are so easy to manipulate. All someone has to do is use the language style you respond to positively and they are speaking the gospel
Obviously you can't refute what's been said, otherwise you would have by now.

Keep attacking the messenge, it's a good look for you guys.
 
Obviously you can't refute what's been said, otherwise you would have by now.

Keep attacking the messenge, it's a good look for you guys.
I don't disagree with the problems in dealing with Covid. I disagree with extrapolating that out until we have people in this country that don't think we need science.

You said it yourself, science in allied with the left. That is pure brainwashing.
 
I don't disagree with the problems in dealing with Covid. I disagree with extrapolating that out until we have people in this country that don't think we need science.

You said it yourself, science in allied with the left. That is pure brainwashing.
If we can't question science then it's not really science is it?
 
And, all the extrapolation by the the entire conservative cool aid drinking tribe has not? You guys no longer are capable of seeing the disjunction of your belief system.
You assert to being the most intelligent person on the forum who is the only one who knows the "truth", yet you don't educate us on that. You pondered our need for "affordable health care" and were asked how to achieve that. So far it has been crickets from you. A person of your claimed intelligence and Godlike knowledge should be able to easily educate us. So when are you going to educate us on how to achieve "affordable health care" as the Godlike entity you claim to be? Seems that you are not interested in education and civil discussion but only in condemning and demeaning.
In common we need affordable health care.
 
So that gives the Dictator @ 1600 the right to have the state control them? That is a job for Justice, or the civil courts, not the wanna be God of the world.

You are practicing hypocrisy, as usual.
Courts don't just look around for cases to prosecute. Someone needs to make a complaint. Duh! AG's don't just look around for cases to prosecute either unless their campaign platform is to "get" someone. Someone needs to make a complaint. If no one reports that a crime has been committed, the justice department doesn't get involved.
 
should be able to easily educate us.
Can't educate the unwilling.

Courts don't just look around for cases to prosecute. Someone needs to make a complaint. Duh! AG's don't just look around for cases to prosecute either unless their campaign platform is to "get" someone. Someone needs to make a complaint. If no one reports that a crime has been committed, the justice department doesn't get involved.

Someone needs to make a complaint OR your former "Fixer" testifies someone committed a crime, OR a news source reports that someone committed a crime. There are many ways a case gets started.
 
Someone needs to make a complaint OR your former "Fixer" testifies someone committed a crime,
Please explain WHY Trump is not allowed to report what he considered to be a "crime". Is he not a voter? Should he not care that CBS made a HUGE, undeclared contribution to the Harris campaign? Is this not illegal? Would it be OK if someone "not MAGA" filed the complaint? Would that cause the disparagement and sneering and inuendo to stop? Why are you and Thales OK with this type of crime to the point where you have to call Trump names and disparage him for bringing it up? You should be criticizing 60 Minutes for their dishonest behavior or you would if either of you had an honest bone in your body. But no, you're all wound up in your TDS and simply cannot see truth when it kicks dirt in your face.

Good chance Trump will win the judgement. CBS needs to settle so that the buyer knows how much money is on the line and this event will get added to the list of positions you have wrong-sided in your blind rage and hatred.
 
Last edited:
I don't disagree with the problems in dealing with Covid. I disagree with extrapolating that out until we have people in this country that don't think we need science.

You said it yourself, science in allied with the left. That is pure brainwashing.

I think mostly what happened is a lot of conservatives realized correctly early on that scientists were not the proper people to make spiritual educational and economic decisions. It made no sense and it still makes no sense and it won't ever make sense.
I still think science and scientists are very useful and need to be dependent on in some cases and to some extents but not as some sort of God like we did during covid..
 
Is this not illegal?
No, It's not illegal.
Why are you and Thales OK with this type of crime to the point where you have to call Trump names and disparage him for bringing it up?
What crime are you even talking about?
You should be criticizing 60 Minutes for their dishonest behavior
What dishonest behavior.

Should 60 minutes allege blackmail if their merger is blocked by the trump administration?

And since your memory is short, remember this?
Should Fox have it's license revoked?

Your blind devotion is mind numbing.
 
I think mostly what happened is a lot of conservatives realized correctly early on that scientists were not the proper people to make spiritual educational and economic decisions.
I agree, but I would’ve settled for the truth. For example, COVID had a high survival rate without vaccines for almost everyone, except for a small group of immunocompromised people. The other 90% didn’t need to do anything.
 
"
I don't disagree with the problems in dealing with Covid. I disagree with extrapolating that out until we have people in this country that don't think we need science.

You said it yourself, science in allied with the left. That is pure brainwashing."

The problem with your extrapolation, is that you made an incorrect assumption. No one thinks we don't need real science but some of us do believe we do not need pseudo and politically guided fake science. Maybe you should review the whole COVID fiasco yet again so you can see who was making stuff up and who wasn't. Oh, that's right. Every time you do, your TDS blinds you so you never see how flawed the original model was. You know, the one that said there would be a 10% mortality rate which sent the whole world into a tailspin, ruined countless lives, put people out of work and bankrupted families and many small businesses. Kept small children out of school which not only retarded their learning but also their social skills. Kept high school seniors from their proms. Forced our elderly to die hopelessly alone in nursing homes. etc. etc. etc. The death rate turned out to be approximately that of a bad flu season so the whole 3 year fiasco was for NOTHING. NOTHING. NOTHING. And no one has apologized. You bought the whole thing. Hook, line, and sinker. YOU were a sucker because of your TDS disease. COVID was bad for Trump so it must be real. Now, where did I leave that useless mask?

Looks like Trump has put a science bulldog in charge of the FDA and so we are FINALLY removing petroleum based food dies from our children's diets. True, Froot Loops won't be as enticing without the bright colors, but at least we won't be ingesting daily doses of petroleum. Hopefully, RFK, Jr. can also get them to reduce the sugar content as well.

And we are FINALLY going to go back to actual testing for vaccines rather than the FDA just waving their hand to approve them.
 
But in order to get the deportation order cancelled due to his asylum claim, he had to admit himself that he was a member of the gang and that was why his life was in jeopardy from a now defunct rival gang. Duh! What part of that are you missing?

I don't believe that. I just found out the direct quote from the judge:
A gang in his native country the immigration judge found, had been “targeting him and threatening him with death because of his family’s pupusa business.

Nothing to do with being in a gang.

Yes, it involves the word "gang", but that's about the only bit of truth in it.
 
I have to say Trump is wasting his time suing over an edited clip. News organizations can edit the heck out of clips as much as they want, I fail to see a cause of action here, and the idea it's criminal is laughable but not funny.

Am I glad he pointed it out to the world, to show what an idiot Harris was? Sure, of course, and that's about where it should have ended.

Like I said, can't let anything go - literally cannot. Has to spend his limited resources doing dumb stuff..
 
Should Fox have it's license revoked?
I don't know. I can't read the article. AOL wants me to join. It is very hard for me to believe that Fox actually altered a Trump interview to make Trump look better since they are very anti-Trump. If they altered the interview, it is most likely to make Trump look bad or to cut out parts of sentences to change their meaning. Trump says enough stupid things that the left should just stop making up stuff and concentrate on the stupid stuff. By making up stuff, they give away the game so that even stupid people can see what is going on.

But, taking the question at face value, YES.

No outfit that says they are "news" should be altering any political interview during election season for any reason that isn't for technical reasons or for length. AND, interviews like this should always be posted later with complete, and accurate transcripts if they were edited at all. THAT would be honest journalism.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom