Trump Administration Predictions (23 Viewers)

[RogerCooper]

And why were they dismissed, and why do you think their absence will result in a weakened system?
I've seen plenty of prosecutors where their absence will make the system stronger.

They were dismissed because the prosecuted cases against violent rioters. Do you expect the criminal justice system to function without prosecutors?

The new US attorney is so incompetent that she has had the case of a man who threw a salami sandwich rejected three times by a grand jury. To quote Judge Wachtler, "You can get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich".

 

[Pat Hartman]

(She withdrew the accusation after being paid off).

Of course you would assume that. And I thought the allegation came from her book and was retracted as an overstatement of the event.

What would you say about a Democrat who did and say the same things?

Locker room talk is locker room talk. No one has actually brought charges so talk is talk. Once Trump became President, the accusations all came out of the woodwork and the rumors were spread by the sufferers of TDS.

Please don't think I am defending Trump. The behavior of many men is certainly piggish. I've known enough men like him during my life to be able to say that they all push the limits. Unless there is an actual assault, women have learned to turn the other cheek and avoid the offender in the future. From the men's perspective it seems to be you won't get to first base unless you give it the ol' college try and so they try and try and try until they succeed. Wealthy men who are even moderately attractive succeed more frequently than mere mortals. And Trump was a real "pretty boy" when he was a young stud around town so he cut quite the swath and that turned into ra** accusations later when he became famous. Like the one that went to trial. The woman had no evidence, she couldn't remember when the "assault" happened and her story was straight out of Law & Order and if you had ever shopped the lingerie department in a high end store like the one in the accusation, you would know that it couldn't have happened as she said. Trump being as famous as he was is unlikely to have made it past the perfume without a personal shopper attaching herself to him for starters and no man would ever be allowed to wander alone through the lingerie department handling the merchandise because that would drive away the actual female shoppers. And then he would have had to get into the dressing room, done the dirty deed and gotten out without ever encountering a sales clerk. The story doesn't hold water.

How many times were your advances refused during your younger days when you were actively pursuing women.

 

[Pat Hartman]

Do you expect the criminal justice system to function without prosecutors?

If the prosecutors are going to pick and choose who to prosecute based on political bias. YES.

The new US attorney is so incompetent that she has had the case of a man who threw a salami sandwich rejected three times by a grand jury. To quote Judge Wachtler, "You can get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich".

But only if the accused is a Trump supporter.

I know that the attacker used a sub as his weapon but that doesn't matter. It could have been a feather.

 

[RogerCooper]

If the prosecutors are going to pick and choose who to prosecute based on political bias. YES.

Are you saying that the Federal prosecutors should not have charged rioters with assault?

 

[RogerCooper]

Please don't think I am defending Trump.

It certainly sounds like you are. You saying that what women said about Trump doesn't count nor does Trump's own statements.

Your discussion of the Carroll case is interesting, but Trump did not make that defense in court, but instead repeatedly insulted the judge. And Trump had requested a judge-only trial.

By the way, when I was young, I asked women out. I never crudely propositioned a women, paid a women for sex or sexually assaulted a women.

 

[Pat Hartman]

Are you saying that the Federal prosecutors should not have charged rioters with assault?

They should have charged ONLY the violent rioters with assault. They overcharged every Republican who was in the area of the Capitol on that day. They broke the law by getting banks and phone companies to provide location data and the FBI went on a four year search and destroy mission to punish every single Trump supporter they could possibly get to. They even charged people who were not even in DC that day. So you can use all the purple words you want to use but that whole debacle was a travesty of justice. Democrats who loot and destroy buildings and cop cars never even come close to the punishment that was meted out to the Jan 6 protesters. That is not justice as we know it. It was the Democrats picking and choosing who to prosecute and going way overboard in their enthusiasm to get Trump and lead us to four years of overreach by the DOJ in their failed attempts to bankrupt Trump or keep him from running again. It didn't work so just suck it up buttercup.

It certainly sounds like you are. You saying that what women said about Trump doesn't count nor does Trump's own statements.

I am merely pointing out what hatred does to you. When you hate Trump and someone offers you money to charge him with a crime and they then change the laws of the state of NY to make that possible, I don't pay much attention to anything anyone with TDS says. I said that men like him have a tendency to be piggish so that is all the condemnation you're going to get from me since I have no personal story to tell.. The personal stories I could tell are all second hand and show Trump in a positive light.

 

[Isaac]

Do you expect the criminal justice system to function without prosecutors?

There are plenty of leftwing prosecutors that the system would function much better without, most of them funded by Soros