Attack on Israel

How are the palestinian people the enemy? Is mass starvation an OK tool of war?
The court of public opinion, the international court, and God will soon pass judgement on Israel, and it's not going to end well for them.
 
How are the palestinian people the enemy?
Simple, they have been perpetually starting conflicts against Israel. They have not sought peace. At a certain point Israel's patience has become exhausted. Israel is the victim here.
Additionally, where has the UN been in all of this?
The UN failed to disarm Hamas and Hezbollah.
The UN failed to protect Israel when attacked.
Employees of the UN have been identified as also being members of Hamas, meaning that the UN supports these terrorists.

Is mass starvation an OK tool of war?
Historically, yes. It's only been about 60 years for this to be designated as evil. But it is only considered "evil" by the advanced Western Nations. When it comes to radical Islam, there are no limits to those who can be killed by any means.
I would suggest you do an AI search on that question.
One such siege during WWII is that of Leningrad (now St. Petersburg)
During the US Civil War there was the siege of Vicksburg.
The focus should not simply be limited to "mass starvation", but also about massive indiscriminate death, such as the US air raid on Dresden or the US firebombing Tokyo. Then there is the ra** of Nanjing (Nanjing Massacre). Plus numerous other examples.

Man's inhumanity to man knows no limits.
 
Last edited:
Simple, they have been perpetually starting conflicts against Israel. They have not sought peace. At a certain point Israel's patience has become exhausted. Israel is the victim here.
Additionally, where has the UN been in all of this?
The UN failed to disarm Hamas and Hezbollah.
The UN failed to protect Israel when attacked.
Employees of the UN have been identified as also being members of Hamas, meaning that the UN supports these terrorists.


Historically, yes. It's only been about 60 years for this to be designated as evil.
I would suggest you do an AI search on that question.
One such siege during WWII is that of Leningrad (now St. Petersburg)
During the US Civil War there was the siege of Vicksburg.
The focus should not simply be limited to "mass starvation", but also about massive indiscriminate death, such as the US air raid on Dresden or the US firebombing Tokyo. Then there is the ra** of Nanjing (Nanjing Massacre). Plus numerous other examples.

Man's inhumanity to man knows no limits.
Regardless of whether it's happened before which obviously I don't doubt, I don't think it's right to use mass starvation against the citizenry.
 
The court of public opinion, the international court, and God will soon pass judgement on Israel, and it's not going to end well for them.
Frankly God has been pretty busy punishing the Israelites for thousands of years and it never seems to end. Maybe it's time to accept Jesus for who he really is
 
I don't think it's right to use mass starvation against the citizenry.
OK, but how "right" is it for the Palestinians to instigate perpetual war against Israel?
Where are the demands that the Palestinians cease and desist and turnover the instigators to an international court for judgement.
Israel is defending itself against antisemitic aggression. The Palestinians need to be called-out.
 
Last edited:
I don't think it's right to use mass starvation against the citizenry.
Would you prefer other weapons of mass destruction? Israel has such things. But they are using conventional - if intense - warfare because that gives people a chance to evacuate ahead of an announced attack. I grieve for many people in Gaza but I have to consider the history of how it got that way. Israel has been on the receiving end of Islamic religiously-based aggression and persecution. They beat the stuffing out of their enemies. Those enemies slink away, lick their wounds, and come back for more because their ****-eyed religion says the only way they can get into their paradise is to die a martyr. They don't have the possibility of redemption. If you are going to adopt a religion, WHY would you pick one that doesn't have a loophole?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom