- Local time
- Today, 01:40
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2006
- Messages
- 16,096
I can't offhand think of an example of this, but from time to time, I want to do something, and carryon whether or not I got a run time error - but I can't just use an onerrror resume next, because the error will need some action.
so I end with this sort of thing
	
	
	
		
is there an easier way to do this. would try .. .catch be a better way of managing this sort of thing? I have never really looked at try .. catch in detail.
 so I end with this sort of thing
		Code:
	
	
	...
     on error goto failed
     execute process that might error
     goto continuepoint
failed:
     cleanup after error
     resume continuepoint
continuepoint:
      carry onis there an easier way to do this. would try .. .catch be a better way of managing this sort of thing? I have never really looked at try .. catch in detail.
 
	 
 
		
 
 
		