CanvasShoes
Registered User.
- Local time
- Yesterday, 17:54
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2009
- Messages
- 25
As in..."wut we got Heah...is Failuh to communiKATE" (but as always, it could be operator error and I'm just not advanced enough to know the obvious-to-the-experts fix on this)
Mods, if this question is in the wrong forum please don't hesitate to move it. I just wasn't sure what category my question/problem fell under.
I'll try not to make this super long. So, I've got a vendor produced database that's got some good tools and is fairly complex. I know once the learning curve is over, I'm going to love it. However, I've got another vendor providing data in an excel format. Problem is...they don't have the column headings (or names) always in the correct space or exactly the same name.
There are around 40 or 50 columns. In order for the Access database to be able to import and work its magic on the data provided by the excel import table, they all have to be in the correct place. Column A in excel has to be called WidgetStable1, Column B WidgetSamples and so on, but often some of them are correct, but WidgetPercentages is way the hell and gone over in BZ somewhere instead of D and is called WidgetVolumes or some damned thing (so not only do I get to manually move them all, I get to doublecheck the work THEY were 'sposed to do and make sure that I've even got the correct values. Is it WidgetVolumes REALLY their version of WidgetPercentages? Or is it WidgetUnits, (yet another required but misplaced and misnamed field)? GAAAAH
So yeah, the vendor providing the widget sample analyses doesn't put them all in the proper order or name them properly. (and Yes, they're SUPPOSED to, they have an old form or something, if I were the PM I'd make them redo it, but budget restraints, blah blah blah...here we are and I'm merely the end user etc).
Now yeah, I can (and have) spend a good bit of time manually moving the columns (with several thousand rows of data, so VERY carefully) around to the right spots. But WHAT a huge pain. And building a query (which I'm merely a baby user at anyway) seems like a really huge undertaking with that many columns, just a sample trial obviously was going to take as much, if not more, time as manually reworking the columns in the spreadsheet.
Oh help me Obi Wan....any ideas?
Mods, if this question is in the wrong forum please don't hesitate to move it. I just wasn't sure what category my question/problem fell under.
I'll try not to make this super long. So, I've got a vendor produced database that's got some good tools and is fairly complex. I know once the learning curve is over, I'm going to love it. However, I've got another vendor providing data in an excel format. Problem is...they don't have the column headings (or names) always in the correct space or exactly the same name.
There are around 40 or 50 columns. In order for the Access database to be able to import and work its magic on the data provided by the excel import table, they all have to be in the correct place. Column A in excel has to be called WidgetStable1, Column B WidgetSamples and so on, but often some of them are correct, but WidgetPercentages is way the hell and gone over in BZ somewhere instead of D and is called WidgetVolumes or some damned thing (so not only do I get to manually move them all, I get to doublecheck the work THEY were 'sposed to do and make sure that I've even got the correct values. Is it WidgetVolumes REALLY their version of WidgetPercentages? Or is it WidgetUnits, (yet another required but misplaced and misnamed field)? GAAAAH
So yeah, the vendor providing the widget sample analyses doesn't put them all in the proper order or name them properly. (and Yes, they're SUPPOSED to, they have an old form or something, if I were the PM I'd make them redo it, but budget restraints, blah blah blah...here we are and I'm merely the end user etc).
Now yeah, I can (and have) spend a good bit of time manually moving the columns (with several thousand rows of data, so VERY carefully) around to the right spots. But WHAT a huge pain. And building a query (which I'm merely a baby user at anyway) seems like a really huge undertaking with that many columns, just a sample trial obviously was going to take as much, if not more, time as manually reworking the columns in the spreadsheet.
Oh help me Obi Wan....any ideas?