Cotswold
Well-known member
- Local time
- Today, 13:33
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2020
- Messages
- 978
@DakotaRidge
When I supplied software I would take the Microsoft advice of database sizes as maximums and not as a challenge to prove them wrong. It isn't a competition.
Yes, sometimes a customer ran databases oversize but I always advised against and refuse to support it. I regarded fixing corrupted databases as a waste of my time and the larger they are then the possibility increases. In many businesses current data is often small and once processed rarely accessed again. So why have many years of the stuff pointlessly sloshing about all the time? As far as the FE is concerned, smaller the better in my opinion. Why drag a huge FE up and down the wires? Even the FE bloats over time and needs to be replaced.
When I supplied software I would take the Microsoft advice of database sizes as maximums and not as a challenge to prove them wrong. It isn't a competition.
Yes, sometimes a customer ran databases oversize but I always advised against and refuse to support it. I regarded fixing corrupted databases as a waste of my time and the larger they are then the possibility increases. In many businesses current data is often small and once processed rarely accessed again. So why have many years of the stuff pointlessly sloshing about all the time? As far as the FE is concerned, smaller the better in my opinion. Why drag a huge FE up and down the wires? Even the FE bloats over time and needs to be replaced.