Hi,
I use a number of tables as data for Combo boxes (i.e. Equipment List, Site Lists etc.).
Using these directly linked to the BE DB was quite slow so therefore I run queries on startip of the DB to copy the data from the BE to the FE and base the queries on the FE. This all works fine and I have no issues with this.
My questions is mainly in regard to the redundant linked tables. Do these have an effect both memory and performance wise after the initial update?
If so, am I better using a recordset update to populate the FE tables on startup and deleting the linked table and append query?
What is the recommended best way to deal with this kind of issue?
Regards
JC
I use a number of tables as data for Combo boxes (i.e. Equipment List, Site Lists etc.).
Using these directly linked to the BE DB was quite slow so therefore I run queries on startip of the DB to copy the data from the BE to the FE and base the queries on the FE. This all works fine and I have no issues with this.
My questions is mainly in regard to the redundant linked tables. Do these have an effect both memory and performance wise after the initial update?
If so, am I better using a recordset update to populate the FE tables on startup and deleting the linked table and append query?
What is the recommended best way to deal with this kind of issue?
Regards
JC