Hello,
I am designing a system for a client who wants to store answers to a survey with over 500 questions, broken into a number of sections.
I have devloped a numbering system so that the fields aren't named by the words of the question, so that each field is immediately identifiable as a given question.
I have read a number of posts here about how if you have more than a certain number of fields in you table things aren't normalised.
But i can't get my head around normailising 500 seperate questions.
I know that i can not have more than 255 fields in one table. So i will definately have to have 2 one to one tables. I'm only on section 3 (of 18) and it takes a phenominal amount of time to save the form. I am wondering if i wouldn't be better off having 18 one to one tables - one for each section. I'm mostly interested in the difference it will make to the speed at which it will operate.
Does anyone have any thoughts or experience with this?
Thanks,
Anna
I am designing a system for a client who wants to store answers to a survey with over 500 questions, broken into a number of sections.
I have devloped a numbering system so that the fields aren't named by the words of the question, so that each field is immediately identifiable as a given question.
I have read a number of posts here about how if you have more than a certain number of fields in you table things aren't normalised.
But i can't get my head around normailising 500 seperate questions.
I know that i can not have more than 255 fields in one table. So i will definately have to have 2 one to one tables. I'm only on section 3 (of 18) and it takes a phenominal amount of time to save the form. I am wondering if i wouldn't be better off having 18 one to one tables - one for each section. I'm mostly interested in the difference it will make to the speed at which it will operate.
Does anyone have any thoughts or experience with this?
Thanks,
Anna