AccessBlaster
Registered User.
- Local time
- Today, 02:06
- Joined
- May 22, 2010
- Messages
- 6,769
The stuff they have dug up on JD is pretty trivial so far, especially when contrasted with the laughing one.
I agree. He said something we all were already thinking about childless cat lady-types begin prototypical liberals, he wrote a book not everyone likes, he went to Yale which suddenly all the Yale-going elites decided to hate, he brought up an interesting but completely fanciful idea about people with no kids being a bit less able to grok everyday political consequences which of course is true, he's conservative suprise surprise, yawn yawn yawn.The stuff they have dug up on JD is pretty trivial so far, especially when contrasted with the laughing one.
Why?Bad choice, will result in a net loss of votes for MAGA,
Actually, that opinion makes me think that Vance as VP may have actually been a genius decision by Trump. I have nothing against him but he wasn't my first choice and I did prefer him to all the names that made the public short list. Vance is unlikely to drive away anyone who would vote for Trump because of his policies and he may draw in some fence sitters.Bad choice, will result in a net loss of votes for MAGA.
Because JD Vance is a fairly typical dude who doesn't have blue hair and a nose ring they have to tear him down and make him out to be very extreme. it works for their base everyone else (normies) gets the jokes.
Of course it does. you use any excuse to try to undermine my perception. You have no point of reference that allows you to see out side your boxes. I'm a moderate Pat, by definition, less subjected to brainwashing. You project your world view so totally, you actually think that only a liberal would conceive of a world not in love with MAGA and its prophet Trump.Actually, that opinion makes me think that Vance as VP may have actually been a genius decision by Trump. I have nothing against him but he wasn't my first choice and I did prefer him to all the names that made the public short list. Vance is unlikely to drive away anyone who would vote for Trump because of his policies and he may draw in some fence sitters.
Trump wields a double edged sword. He must continue to solidify his base. Which are generally made up of pretty narrow minded supporters, That's not an insult, it's a fact.Why?
I'm unsure if you noticed, but they've been "solidified" since 2016. It's the Dems who are worried about Kamala's record. It's not only bad but very inconsistent even for a DEI hire.Trump wields a double edged sword. He must continue to solidify his base.
Maybe a better choice of words would have pander to his base. It's still the same sword. MAGA contempt has to be fueled. The rest of us would like to a more moderate approach.I'm unsure if you noticed, but they've been "solidified" since 2016. It's the Dems who are worried about Kamala's record. It's not only bad but very inconsistent even for a DEI hire.
At least he has a base, Biden also had a base, but where is the DEI's base? She hasn't earned anything. She's a social climber and people see it.Maybe a better choice of words would have pander to his base. It's still the same sword. MAGA contempt has to be fueled. The rest of us would like to a more moderate approach.
Look who's talking.You have no point of reference that allows you to see out side your boxes.
I don't tell how I see the world. I just tell you that yalls narrow. You know your views, but you don't care. And you show contempt.Look who's talking.
There is nothing pragmatic about being wrong or denying what is obviously true. Those that tout climate change hysteria do not follow their own advice and only wish to control others by gas lighting something that is not in our purview world wide.I am pragmatic, I am critical of my ideas, and I often seek out information that changes my perception.