When I looked, it was on CNN's YouTube channel. Nothing there at all. Has anyone seen anything on their actual news channel about it? I gather that is where most people go, rather than tucked awayin their online news site, with little coverage. Eventually, they will have to give it airtime, even if its a biased tiny amount considering its severity.
Kavanaugh I remember had several accusers at the time, but their stories fell apart. The problem is, it seems to be a new strategy from the left. Make sexual assault allegations without corroborating evidence as a political strategy towards republicans. But when the shoe is on the other foot, they go quiet.
Regarding Trump, he was a billionaire. Some women view rich targets as a way to solve their finanical problems. The payouts can be enormous. Sadly, it then muddies the water between legitimate claims and those based on financial greed. This type of slander is a repulsive side of human nature. Some are prepared to say anything just to get a big payday. Or, in many cases, a political victory. People don't seem to have any shame over this type of thing anymore. With the Democrats willing to sully the name of someone with an exemplary record in Brett Kavenaugh, they believe someone who has zero proof. They are not interested in the truth, only a supreme court outcome.
I hate to see takedowns based on sexual assault allegations. There was an actor Ken Barlow. He had 4 different people make allegations against him in the UK. All their stories fell apart under scrutiny, and he was found not guilty. We have the previous Scottish SNP leader, Alex Salmond, found not guilty of assaulting 9 women. Evidence of corroboration between some of the women and political motives were present. Have they no shame? I fear the number of claims that are just not legitimate.
Yet what happens to those who ruin peoples lives and reputations with false allegations? Virtually nothing. Just look at the stats on it.
Moke, that is rather a long list there! I would be interested to see how many of those are a) Democrats, b) seeking financial gain.
Like any case of sexual assault, those who are accused should be presumed innocent until due process is completed, and that includes Biden. There is nothing to stop you from having a probabilistic approach on your estimate of someones guilt. For example, I feel there is a reasonable chance that Biden may have done what has been alleged, in particular since he has a history of being a bit hands on. But I also don't think that just because 4 witnesses have come forward, that it is true. They could all be lying.