Trump Administration Predictions (12 Viewers)

[moke123]

No one with half a brain thinks Trump would not leave the WH in 2029 when his term is up.

Again, you're the only one who said anything about that. I don't get your point. What's that got to do with anything I said?

 

[Isaac]

I am down to 56% Trump, in case anyone is watching my fascinating, perhaps amusing, evolution of disillusionment.

If I go below 50% that means I could potentially vote Democrat in the next election. However, even if I got below 50% on Trump, voting Democrat would only happen if the next person was promising to be like him.

Like Metallica, sad but true.

I am not afraid to publish the truth about changes in my own opinions over time. It keeps me honest as a human being, despite how difficult it is to say say I was wrong about some things.

 

[Pat Hartman]

Again, you're the only one who said anything about that. I

Here maybe but Newsome is talking about it and so is the brainless Bill Mayer. He was probably stoned during his monolog on Friday. Newsome has no excuse.

 

[The_Doc_Man]

Bill Maher?

Bill is a person who was and still is on the Democratic side of things, but he has not held back criticizing his own party for essentially running around in circles like recently decapitated chickens who would be screaming "the sky is falling" if only they still had vocal cords.

Bill has many postings on You Tube that indicate that he clearly sees how the Progressive Liberals have been and will continue to be responsible for tanking the Democratic party because they refuse to recognize their own failings.

Consider Matthew 7:5 - "Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye"
Seems to me that in this case, that little bit of Biblical advice fits the situation almost perfectly.

 

[AccessBlaster]

James Carvell is a bit like Bill Maher hard-core progressives that bitch about liberals but will never leave the democrat party.

 

[Pat Hartman]

Bill has many postings on You Tube that indicate that he clearly sees how the Progressive Liberals have been and will continue to be responsible for tanking the Democratic party because they refuse to recognize their own failings.

And then he says stuff like he did on Friday. We can only attribute that mindlessness to dope.

I was a regular watcher prior to Bill catching TDS. He still has it but after his in person meeting with Trump, his view has mellowed.

 

[Pat Hartman]

James Carvell is a bit like Bill Maher hard-core progressives that bitch about liberals but will never leave the democrat party.

I could see Maher leaving the Dems but never Carvell.

 

[AccessBlaster]

it's Maher's shtick. Oh look Bill's moving towards the center, than immediately makes a huge left turn.

 

[AccessBlaster]

I am down to 56% Trump, in case anyone is watching my fascinating, perhaps amusing, evolution of disillusionment.

If I go below 50% that means I could potentially vote Democrat in the next election. However, even if I got below 50% on Trump, voting Democrat would only happen if the next person was promising to be like him.

What percentage point would you give Gavin if any? He's starting to mimic Trump's brash behavior. His name recognition has been moving ahead of the pack. He's pretending to care about crime etc etc.

 

[Pat Hartman]

Oh look Bill's moving towards the center, than immediately makes a huge left turn.

No. His remarks on Friday were those of someone high on drugs. They were beyond the pale and not even funny. Usually he's funny even when he's dead wrong.

 

[moke123]

Here maybe but Newsome is talking about it and so is the brainless Bill Mayer.

Again that has nothing to do with what I said. Doesn't matter what anyone else said about anything.

 

[Pat Hartman]

You were making a comment on someone manipulating someone and that is exactly what my comment was about. Someone manipulating someone. It was just many someones instead of a single someone. Playing dumb doesn't become you. It makes you sound like Colin (not isladogs).

 

[Isaac]

What percentage point would you give Gavin if any? He's starting to mimic Trump's brash behavior. His name recognition has been moving ahead of the pack. He's pretending to care about crime etc etc.

To be totally honest with you I just have not diligently followed Gavin enough to know that much about his specific actions and policies. So I can't really form an intelligent opinion at this point. I am pretty sure I would disagree with much of his policies but that's just a wild guess

 

[The_Doc_Man]

His nature policies - failing to clear underbrush from forests during extreme droughts - contributed to many of the CA forest fires, for one thing.

 

[BlueSpruce]

"In the interests of national security" trumps civil rights that progressive liberals are exploiting to further their agenda in our woke sanctuary cities that protect criminals. Citizens want protection in order to enjoy life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

The donkey's tree fell and it's time to turn it into fire wood.

 

[BlueSpruce]

@moke123 I see you dropped the "manipulation by Republicans" like a hot potato. I know Rosie isn't a good example since she's dumb as a rock but there're lots of others. Even on this forum

@Pat Hartman, Just for the record, @moke123 didn't drop what you quoted, see below:

 

[RogerCooper]

He has until Oct 14 before it takes affect. Trump has a fairly good record with emergency docket rulings. My guess they will issue a split or partial relief, if they take it under a emergency docket. Who knows.

Because this a tax dispute, the Supreme Court will not take through the emergency docket. Taxes are handled differently because they can always be paid back. Expect them to take as a regular case and issue a ruling in the Spring.

 

[AccessBlaster]

Because this a tax dispute, the Supreme Court will not take through the emergency docket. Taxes are handled differently because they can always be paid back. Expect them to take as a regular case and issue a ruling in the Spring.

It's not just a tax or tariff dispute. It’s a separation of powers fight, plus the amount of dollars hanging in the balance could be in the billions. That's why I think it has a chance of making it on the emergency docket. Again I don't know, I'm just spitball'n.

 

[moke123]

Add this to the list

Trump Broke Law When Deploying LA Guard, Marines: Judge

Federal takeovers may have just become a lot harder for Trump to pull off.

www.huffpost.com

 

[BlueSpruce]

Because this a tax dispute, the Supreme Court will not take through the emergency docket. Taxes are handled differently because they can always be paid back. Expect them to take as a regular case and issue a ruling in the Spring.

It will be expedited because it's a "national emergency" that threatens our national security, it's Donald Trump's baby, and the majority of the Judges are Republicans.

Were the majority of the civil servants that Trump laid off Democrats?