Hmm. One idea might be to scour the content of the Code Repository. In some container somewhere, assign each C.R. article with a few tags/keywords that really define its main gist. Then pickup new posts with those keywords and possibly reference the attached C.R. article(s).
To be totally honest, I'm unsure what is the quality, volume and modernness of the C.R., it's something I haven't looked at much on any site including AWF, but many users swear by it and enjoy trying out other peoples' code.
One thing I've noticed is how many posters would benefit from simply looking their methods, properties, events, and objects up in Microsoft documentation. Though I'm unsure whether generating any message or emphasis on that would actually benefit the forum. This may be in the same category as my opinions on the 'Solved' feature.... Convenience and feel good vs. actually improving the development maturity of developers. I guess you can't always achieve both.
Slightly petty question: Does the software have spell check? There are a few posters whose spelling is so bad that I wonder if they were sober when they posted - I mean tou thu poynt ware iz hrd too red. And I'm not referring to language barrier situations.
Most browsers do these days but some don't notice or maybe have it turned off.. I guess this may seem petty until you look at its impact on algorithms, keywords & traffic.