Tim L
Registered User.
- Local time
- Today, 22:26
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2002
- Messages
- 414
Hello O venerable people,
It's a long time since I have posted in these forums, and I don't recall ever having made my way into the Excel forums before, so Hi!
Having done a couple of searches (and scanned over 500 thread headers) I have to come to the conclusion either I'm not searching right, or no-one else has come here to ask about this issue before.
The question:
How do you get MS Excel 2010 to display a bar chart with two both primary and secondary vertical axes and still display the bars side by side?
The problem:
I have a set of data which I wish to plot using the Clustered Column style chart. There are two sets of date to plot vertically with wildly differing scales values so I need both a primary and secondary axis, which is where the problem comes in...
The programmers of Excel have decided, in their infinite wisdom, that as soon as the secondary axis is brought into play, the bars should be displayed one-behind the other, rather than side by side, as is the case before the secondary axis is brought into play. This is an issue because one bar can obscure another, and it happens either way around so some data will become hidden. It is possible to adjust column widths, colours, and transparency levels but that is not the ideal solution as it's still not really clear enough.
The "Separated" value for "Series Overlap" does not appear to have any affect at all when the bars have been arranged this way.
Happily, OpenOffice.org Calc, back in Version 3.3.0, will do the same, but those wonderful people have a "Show bars side by side" option. Yeay. Unfortunately I need to be able to replicate the side by side in Excel 2010 in work, where I won't be able to have OpenOffice.org installed and it would be naughty to send the date home to work on, so that's a no, no. It has however given me the chance to put an example of what I'm looking to achieve, into the attached.
The attached has a randomly generated set of example data and charts showing the full set of data with bars overlapping, and the smaller sets highlighting the side by side and obscuring. I also tested with the smaller set of data to see if the chart would behave differently with less data. Apparently not.:banghead:
It's a long time since I have posted in these forums, and I don't recall ever having made my way into the Excel forums before, so Hi!
Having done a couple of searches (and scanned over 500 thread headers) I have to come to the conclusion either I'm not searching right, or no-one else has come here to ask about this issue before.
The question:
How do you get MS Excel 2010 to display a bar chart with two both primary and secondary vertical axes and still display the bars side by side?
The problem:
I have a set of data which I wish to plot using the Clustered Column style chart. There are two sets of date to plot vertically with wildly differing scales values so I need both a primary and secondary axis, which is where the problem comes in...
The programmers of Excel have decided, in their infinite wisdom, that as soon as the secondary axis is brought into play, the bars should be displayed one-behind the other, rather than side by side, as is the case before the secondary axis is brought into play. This is an issue because one bar can obscure another, and it happens either way around so some data will become hidden. It is possible to adjust column widths, colours, and transparency levels but that is not the ideal solution as it's still not really clear enough.
The "Separated" value for "Series Overlap" does not appear to have any affect at all when the bars have been arranged this way.
Happily, OpenOffice.org Calc, back in Version 3.3.0, will do the same, but those wonderful people have a "Show bars side by side" option. Yeay. Unfortunately I need to be able to replicate the side by side in Excel 2010 in work, where I won't be able to have OpenOffice.org installed and it would be naughty to send the date home to work on, so that's a no, no. It has however given me the chance to put an example of what I'm looking to achieve, into the attached.
The attached has a randomly generated set of example data and charts showing the full set of data with bars overlapping, and the smaller sets highlighting the side by side and obscuring. I also tested with the smaller set of data to see if the chart would behave differently with less data. Apparently not.:banghead: