KenHigg
Registered User
- Local time
- Today, 17:47
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2004
- Messages
- 13,327
Rich said:But they don't see themselves as sleazeballs, desire is often overwhelming
So is your imagination

Rich said:But they don't see themselves as sleazeballs, desire is often overwhelming
Would that be soap suds?KenHigg said:while chugging suds...![]()
![]()
Again, this has nothing whatsoever to do with one's sexuality.Rich said:But they don't see themselves as sleazeballs, desire is often overwhelming
Sorry, I wasn't trying to make a dig against you. I was just venting my irritation at the term.cheuschober said:Believe it or not, I think it's a terrible term fraught with supposition, unclarified linguistic ideas, and just plain misleading all as I pointed out earlier. I guess I'm simply more wont to speak on the level society has dictated than to fight to rise above it. 'My bad.'
Kraj said:Sorry, I wasn't trying to make a dig against you. I was just venting my irritation at the term.
Kraj said:Again, this has nothing whatsoever to do with one's sexuality.
Kraj said:An anectode that somewhat relates to the topic, but that I think you'll find interesting:
Recently I was at an event where I overheard a conversation between two men. One began telling the other how "flaming" and feminine gays were an embarassment and weren't even real men. He went on in greater detail but I don't remember every comment. I was instantly put off by such a rude, close-minded, and somewhat offensive commentary.
Then I was told who he was: a homosexual, S&M bondage master who takes photos for a bondage magazine semi-professionally. I'm sure he prefers butch men, but you'd think a person with rather unconventional sexual tastes would have learned to be open minded. How's that for a Freudian Rubic's cube, eh?
*Ahem*Rich said:I never said it was, however one might feel less comfortable having to say it to male member of society, or a masculine member, or even more so to one of those who sit somewhere in between.
How about this?: "I don't care what anybodys sexuality is." <-Period.Rich said:Too true, I don't care what anybodys sexuality is, as long as their not male and have me in their sights![]()
Fair enough.cheuschober said:Truly blind but so transparent I would feign to call him a Rubic's cube.
Kraj said:*Ahem*
How about this?: "I don't care what anybodys sexuality is." <-Period.
Kraj said:My point is why does your original statement have to have the qualifier, "as long they don't hit on me"?
Rich said:Nah, you're just becoming Metrosexual![]()
So why do you label me and Rich as "anti American" despite me keep telling you I'm anti the American warmongering don't-care-about-anybody-else government, and not the American populace?KenHigg said:Seems it's just bad juju to do grouping and labels at all. Don't we have enough division...
Silly questionGroundrush said:For some reason I thought the term "Metrosexual" referred to people that like to have sex in underground Tube Stations....![]()
ColinEssex said:Silly questionbut has anyone in the UK ever heard of the word "metrosexual" before reading it in this thread? I've never heard it before.
Col
Kraj said:So, because you're straight a gay man is not allowed to hit on you? It's beyond you're ability to deal with? You can't simply say, "No thank you, I'm not interested"?
MeeeeoooowGroundrush said:.......I thought questions usually have question marks at the end
Groundrush said:anyway just googled "Metrosexual" and look what I found.
metrosexual (met.roh.SEK.shoo.ul) n. An urban male with a strong aesthetic sense who spends a great deal of time and money on his appearance and lifestyle.
—metrosexuality n.