Steve R.
Retired
- Local time
- Today, 05:17
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2006
- Messages
- 5,609
Obama by calling for the ouster of Assad and by supplying covert assistance to so-called rebels in Syria has actually fostered the growth of ISIS, which has now "invaded" Iraq. This "invasion" is the result of Obama incompetent foreign policy.
Part of what makes this complicated is the chaos in Syria. It is difficult to tell the "good" rebels from the "bad" rebels. They also are fickle and change sides quite a bit. Consequently providing support to the "good" rebels means supplying the "bad" rebels too.
Unbelievably the Washington Post published this today. "Obama seeks $500M to train, equip Syrian rebels" Essentially the US will continue to supply "both" sides.
American Prosperity has this article: Militant Islamic Group ISIS Trained at U.S. Base in Jordan
The correct strategy to restore Iraq, it would seem, would be to neutralize ISIS by supporting Assad. Assad would then be in a position to attack the ISIS safe areas in Syria. Potentially this could end the Syrian civil war. Potentially it would allow Iraq to re-constitute itself (assuming that would even be possible.)
The sad reality is that Iraq is really an artificial country that should be allowed to split into three countries. Nevertheless, Obama is responsible for this mess.
Part of what makes this complicated is the chaos in Syria. It is difficult to tell the "good" rebels from the "bad" rebels. They also are fickle and change sides quite a bit. Consequently providing support to the "good" rebels means supplying the "bad" rebels too.
Unbelievably the Washington Post published this today. "Obama seeks $500M to train, equip Syrian rebels" Essentially the US will continue to supply "both" sides.
American Prosperity has this article: Militant Islamic Group ISIS Trained at U.S. Base in Jordan
Jordanian officials recently revealed that members of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (also known as ISIS) were trained in 2012 by U.S. military instructors at a secret base in Jordan.
Of course, this raises the obvious question: Why did the American military train dangerous Islamic militants?
Answer: Because they were being trained with the intent of overthrowing the Syrian government and President Bashar al-Assad.
Jordanian officials claimed these Syrian rebels were screened to ensure they had no ties to Al-Qaeda or any other overly radical Islamic group. They also said that this training had no intention of being used in Iraq.
.....
However, these good foreign policy intentions have backfired on the Obama Administration in a big way. Especially since the President declared an end to combat operations in Iraq nearly four years ago.
The correct strategy to restore Iraq, it would seem, would be to neutralize ISIS by supporting Assad. Assad would then be in a position to attack the ISIS safe areas in Syria. Potentially this could end the Syrian civil war. Potentially it would allow Iraq to re-constitute itself (assuming that would even be possible.)
The sad reality is that Iraq is really an artificial country that should be allowed to split into three countries. Nevertheless, Obama is responsible for this mess.