Peaceful Transition Of Power (1 Viewer)

[AccessBlaster]

First lets discuss President Obama's "peaceful transition of power." President Obama used a corrupt FBI to setup an incoming President. There is little doubt Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton and a complicit news media did not know they were breaking the law with illegal surveillance of a presidential candidate.

Despite the illegal FISA warrant and a hostile news media this President has accomplished more for the American people then any other President in recent history.
He was cheated during his first term and deserves a do over as a penalty for illegal activity. Unfortunately there are no do overs.

 

[Jon]

Recent revelations show that some of the lawyers in Mullers team took out insurance policies because if they were investigated, they would get caught in malpractise. They joked about wiping iPhones, and 31 of their iPhones were wiped when subpoenaed. It sounds like the destruction of Hillary Clintons emails all over again. A corrupt investigation of Hillary and a corrupt investigation of Trump, but both in the opposite direction.

 

[Pat Hartman]

I would love it if Trump could have a do over but even he's too old for 8 more years. Let's just elect him again so he can have 4 more years and hopefully the Republications will get on board and cooperate. It is absolutely disgusting that for at least 6 years, they all promised to replace Obama Care as soon as they got control of Congress. Well, they had control of Congress for two years and they refused. That was mostly Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell working against Trump but it didn't happen and it should have.

Hillary still thinks she was cheated because she doesn't understand that the purpose of the Electoral College was for just this situation. Support for her was very limited to mostly large coastal cities with a couple of blue spots in big inland cities. The rest of the country as you can see by a picture of the county map is mostly conservative. The Electoral College means you need a broad base to win the presidency rather than a deep base. Sort of like the opposite of a normalized schema

And this time, the Dems are preparing for stuffing the ballot box which is why she told Joe to not concede defeat no matter what. So, WHO EXACTLY is against a peaceful transition of power????? Even blue states have red counties. If you look at the pattern, it is the poor and uneducated from the inner cities who are voting Democrat these days because they want "free" stuff. Not having to pay income tax isn't sufficient for them. They want more free stuff and the Dems keep them on the line with empty promises. Trump has actually delivered on many of his promises despite all the opposition from the Dems and Rinos.

 

[The_Doc_Man]

Sort of like the opposite of a normalized schema

Wait.... Does that mean that Hillary's schemes were abnormal?

 

[Steve R.]

The faux concern over the "Peaceful Transition Of Power" has been manufactured by the Democrats. The Democrats sanctimoniously assert that the integrity of voting must be "protected", yet they deploy every deceptive trick imaginable to obfuscate the election process to make it less secure and prone to fraud. That will make it "easy" for the Democrats to assert that the election process was tainted.

 

[Pat Hartman]

The horror of that becomes mindboggling. Pelosi becomes president while we "redo" the election.

 

[Steve R.]

A couple of election related stories have emerged related to the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett to the US Supreme Court. In the first example, a Democratic orientated university professor said that her nomination should be delayed till after the election as that would "disclose" the will of the people. Furthermore, he noted that voting is already underway so it would be "disruptive" to continue with the nomination process. Exactly why early voting should be prohibited. Two short comings with that biased viewpoint. Trump is President now and his win represented the will of the people. So, Trump through this nomination is carrying out the will of the people as they elected him to do so. Second, if this professor is so concerned about the public knowing the policies of the people running for President, that professor should be demanding that Biden release the names of people he would propose to nominate to the Supreme Court. That would allow the public to truly make a more informed decision regarding Biden.

Second, Democrats say Judge Barrett should recuse herself in election disputes. The Democrats though this demand hope to cripple the "Peaceful Transition Of Power" through this obstructionist tactic. Recall the hell that Democrats put this nation through as a result of the unfortunate recusal of Jeff Sessions as Attorney General from the Russia hoax.

As a side note: The buying of votes is illegal. Bloomberg pours $16M into Florida race to pay restitution for former felons to vote. However, if Bloomberg is doing this out or pure altruism, it would be legal. Considering how close we are to the election, that Bloomberg supports the Democratic Party, and that this money appears to be targeted for the benefit of the Black community, it appears that Bloomberg is attempting to sway the Florida vote in favor of Democrats. The judicial system will have to make the determination on whether Bloomberg's actions are legal or illegal. I seriously doubt this is being done by Bllomberg for purposes of altruism.

 

[Pat Hartman]

The obscene thing is if Bloomberg is prosecuted and goes to trial and insists he was just being generous, a left-leaning jury would absolve him whereas they would never absolve Trump under the same circumstances. If the left didn't have double standards, they would have no standards at all Someone should put that on a billboard.