Question for Legal Beagles (1 Viewer)

[Dick7Access]

I have a few days ago had a conversation with a friend who is very conservation and a Trump fan.

He said he was disappointed with Pam Bondi. He said she hasn’t brought very many cases to trial, if any. I did not have an answer. I did some research and found many, many cases since Jan 20th brought to trial by the US Department of Justis. I was under the understanding that if the USDJ brings something to trial it comes by the director of the Attorney General. Am I mistaken. I have googled it and can’t come up with much.

 

[Isaac]

I have a few days ago had a conversation with a friend who is very conservation and a Trump fan.

He said he was disappointed with Pam Bondi. He said she hasn’t brought very many cases to trial, if any. I did not have an answer. I did some research and found many, many cases since Jan 20th brought to trial by the US Department of Justis. I was under the understanding that if the USDJ brings something to trial it comes by the director of the Attorney General. Am I mistaken. I have googled it and can’t come up with much.

I would guess the difference is in the definitions. certainly the department of Justice already had a massive pipeline. Some of those cases are probably going to trial without it being relevant to the new administration. Maybe he meant new prosecutions?

 

[Dick7Access]

I would guess the difference is in the definitions. certainly the department of Justice already had a massive pipeline. Some of those cases are probably going to trial without it being relevant to the new administration. Maybe he meant new prosecutions?

The question is not what what cases were on going trial. The question is all trials by the US Department of Justus by the authority of the attorney General?

 

[The_Doc_Man]

The attorney general's name might be on all litigation initiated by the DOJ, but maybe not. For example "The United States vs. Joe Schmidlap" rather than "Pam Bondi vs. Joe Schmidlap."

 

[Dick7Access]

The attorney general's name might be on all litigation initiated by the DOJ, but maybe not. For example "The United States vs. Joe Schmidlap" rather than "Pam Bondi vs. Joe Schmidlap."

I guess I am not making my self clear. Even if her name is not on the paper work. I have always assumed that if it goes to court by the US Department of Justice then it is under the authority of the Attorney General. Now I am not sure I am right. I have email the US Department of Justise but by the time they answer me J D will be president.

 

[AccessBlaster]

Unfortunately Pam Bondi, Kash Patel, Dan Bongino have been slow walking for whatever reason. Arrests need to happen.