Shocking news about UtterAccess owner

Believe it or not there are a lot of laws which protect sex offenders so I know to be careful about disclosure.

Trial looks to be scheduled for November but that always gets continued out.
 
I know to be careful about disclosure.

I rather expected that. But you are not likely to be directly involved, so you can offer an opinion. If the case is really strong, is the defense likely to ask for a continuance? For this kind of case, what kind of extenuating circumstances would even apply? I have a feeling based on your earlier comments that a couple of YEARS of continuances would probably be ineffective.
 
The litigation is only a few months old. Probably wont reach trial for another year if it gets that far. From just the little info I read there's a good chance he'll look for a deal. These cases can drag out when you have forensic experts to challenge their experts, psych experts for mitigation, etc.
 
If you [Moke] reacted as strongly as you did to what you saw through your privileged access, I will trust that it is definitely not something that we want to spill into the forum very much.
I agree with Doc and suggest we not publish anything that could alter the outcome of this case. We should lay low and wait until the conclusion of this case.
 
suggest we not publish anything that could alter the outcome of this case.
No one here possesses anything that could affect the outcome, unless you know Jack and have info on his activities. Everything I have is public information. You could visit the courthouse and request the file. I just have the means to access it electronically.

Besides if I posted the chat log you'd probably throw-up. 🤮
 
No one here possesses anything that could affect the outcome, unless you know Jack and have info on his activities. Everything I have is public information. You could visit the courthouse and request the file. I just have the means to access it electronically.

Besides if I posted the chat log you'd probably throw-up. 🤮
I have seen several defendants claim they were unable to get a fair trial due to prejudiced publicity.
 
Last edited:
There is the other side of that coin... if we publish too much about the case, someone in a dark suit, matching hat, and big sunglasses will come by to ask you some questions. They will be from Division 6 and will categorically deny having any sense of humor.
 
There is the other side of that coin... if we publish too much about the case, someone in a dark suit, matching hat, and big sunglasses will come by to ask you some questions. They will be from Division 6 and will categorically deny having any sense of humor.
They already have enough on Jack. If they troll here it would be to find out if anyone else was involved with Jack.
 
There is the other side of that coin... if we publish too much about the case, someone in a dark suit, matching hat, and big sunglasses will come by to ask you some questions. They will be from Division 6 and will categorically deny having any sense of humor.
After 45 years Doc, I got stories. Can't tell them, but I got them. I know those guys by name. :cool:
 
The litigation is only a few months old. Probably wont reach trial for another year if it gets that far. From just the little info I read there's a good chance he'll look for a deal. These cases can drag out when you have forensic experts to challenge their experts, psych experts for mitigation, etc.
Maybe he's planning on claiming insanity? However, because of the severity of this case, they would lock him up in a nut house and throw away the key.
 
After 45 years Doc, I got stories. Can't tell them, but I got them. I know those guys by name. :cool:

The guys to whom I was referring usually just give their initials. And they will offer the opinion that THEY make the black suits look good. ;)
 
The guys to whom I was referring usually just give their initials. And they will offer the opinion that THEY make the black suits look good. ;)
You've been watching too many MIB movies. Stick with the Transformers Sector 7 outfit. I think the Feds already know everything there is to know about Jack and anyone else associated with his criminal activities. They have some really good forensic tools for gathering and analyzing relevant information and when they announce an indictment, it's because they have done their due diligence. This is not a high profile case where they're going to spend unlimited money on it. Two years worth of surveillance and research easily costs millions. This is going to be a slam dunk open and shut case. That's all.
 
Is it even POSSIBLE to watch too many MIB movies?
Yes, I have seen the three MIB movies over 20 times, and counting. You'd be surprised how many little details I have picked up from watching a movie over and over again.
 
Last edited:
This is going to be a slam dunk open and shut case. That's all.
Don't count your chickens before they hatch. While I agree from what I've seen, there is still a long road ahead.
Take for instance all the cases in NJ under Habba have now been thrown into turmoil. If convictions get tossed will re-trials be barred by double jeopardy? We had tens of thousands of drug convictions dismissed in Ma. due to 2 drug lab techs messing up. Nothings ever a slam dunk.
 
Don't count your chickens before they hatch. While I agree from what I've seen, there is still a long road ahead.
Take for instance all the cases in NJ under Habba have now been thrown into turmoil. If convictions get tossed will re-trials be barred by double jeopardy? We had tens of thousands of drug convictions dismissed in Ma. due to 2 drug lab techs messing up. Nothings ever a slam dunk.
Yes, there's always the possibility of prosecution losing the case, e.g. inadmissible evidence, entrapment, hung jury, Donald Trump is the defendant, etc.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom