T-Dawg

Isaac

Lifelong Learner
Local time
Yesterday, 16:10
Joined
Mar 14, 2017
Messages
11,263
Wow looks like they finally got him for grabbing a handful of extra sauce packets at Taco bell. I just knew it would happen eventually.
 
And they sealed the indictment so no one could see it. Do they think DJT will flee to "Russia" if he knows what the charges are before he turns himself in? This really is banana republic tactics. We're going to arrest you but we are not going to tell you what for! I guess that is SOP for the Democrats. "you have to vote for the bill before you find out what's in it". Sadly, that is the way Congress always works. At best they read the talking points and then behind the scenes, they trade votes. I'll vote for your bill even though I have no idea what it is about if you vote for my bill.

Apparently, the leaks from the grand jury were all a plant.
 
And I am so tired of hearing the ONLY thing libs can possibly come up with to explain all of this is, "2 wrongs don't make a right" (their answer to the whole selective prosecution obviousness).

No, 2 wrongs don't make a right, but selective prosecution DOES make a wrong.

It really flabbergasts me how far they want to push some of this stuff. They couldn't just be happy with the welfare state they created around the time I was born. They couldn't be happy with laws and cultural shifts that eliminated people with alternative lives/identities from being actually mistreated. They couldn't be happy with a ton of immigration pouring in for decades.

They just HAD to push it so far. How quickly it went from "Just live and let live, and let everyone believe what they want", or "make sure the laws provide equal opportunity for everyone", to............."Everyone must bow down and verbally assent to this belief or that belief", and "the government will forcibly restribute results and consequences so that personal choice means nothing".

If peace seems elusive, I'd say it's definitely not the fault of those on the right-er side of the equation.
 
I told my wife a week ago if they indict Trump it will be on a Friday, missed it by one day.

The indictment did take the Tennessee trans killer out of the news cycle, so mission accomplished.

Adam Carolla was on Tucker last night and pointed out the left is provoking Trump's base into another J6 event, and his base needs to realize this is a nothing burger that's going nowhere, so don't take the fed bait.
 
I was thinking about that too.

After viewing online forums, with all the libs rushing around to make sure everyone in the club knows
Shhhh. Yes I know we normally talk a lot about hate ideology in mass shootings, but we're not mentioning it for this one!

Those poor kids. Looks like Trans Day of Vengeance wasn't a joke, and brutally ended their lives. Absolutely horrific to even think about.

And of course, the willfully deceived will absolutely ignore the obvious thing staring everyone in the face ....
That actually, what TN was doing protecting children is even more relevant now than ever.

Because eventually, children grow up.
 
The indictment did take the Tennessee trans killer out of the news cycle, so mission accomplished.
There is a back-story currently running. Here we have a tans person who committed a violent act against Christians. Assuming that the story below is accurate, the far left is only concerned about transphobia and has no empathy for those killed by the trans person. This story is a unfortunate continuation of a never-ending Democratic narrative that began in earnest with Obama. Starting with Obama you were condemned by the Democrats if you spoke of Islamic extremism or were designated as racist for saying Covid came from China. Furthermore, for all the humanitarian word-salad that Democrats profess, they never acknowledge the persecution of Christians and women in Islamic countries. This story reinforces the narrative that for the Democrats, the victim is the trans person not the people who were killed by the trans person.

Adam Carolla was on Tucker last night and pointed out the left is provoking Trump's base into another J6 event, and his base needs to realize this is a nothing burger that's going nowhere, so don't take the fed bait.
There may be a lot of validity to that. J6 has the smell of a false flag operation.
Those who are anti-Trump are possessed with extreme irrational hatred. They will willingly use the tactic of "the ends justify the means" to get Trump, whether Trump is innocent of guilty is irrelevant to them.
 
Last edited:
There is a back-story currently running. Here we have a tans person who committed a violent act against Christians. Assuming that the story below is accurate, the far left is only concerned about transphobia and has no empathy for those killed by the trans person. This story is a unfortunate continuation of a never-ending Democratic narrative that began in earnest with Obama. Starting with Obama you were condemned by the Democrats if you spoke of Islamic extremism or were designated as racist for saying Covid came from China. Furthermore, for all the humanitarian word-salad that Democrats profess, they never acknowledge the persecution of Christians and women in Islamic countries. This story reinforces the narrative that for the Democrats, the victim is the trans person not the people who were killed by the trans person.


There may be a lot of validity to that. J6 has the smell of a false flag operation.
Those who are anti-Trump are possessed with extreme irrational hatred. They will willingly use the tactic of "the ends justify the means" to get Trump, whether Trump is innocent of guilty is irrelevant to them.

There is a great show

where a guy who knows what he is talking about constantly debunks some of the nonsense that is promoted by modern American intellectual Muslims who try to convince people, with an air of authority, totally false things about Islam.

The other day he was talking about how this person, some California educator who is Muslim, was claiming in some University speech that Muslims gave women the right to vote a long time ago. He was like "right to vote? what are you talking about - the Koran says that if 2 competing people for a caliphate, you cut the head off of the one" - etc., quoting from Koran and Koran teaching. I'm not remembering the details precisely, but it was along those lines.

He often warns that popular Muslim feminist intellectuals in the USA try very hard to sell people an idea of Islam that just isn't real for almost any Muslims, and certainly not as taught in the Koran. Just complete and total lies, in some cases laughably the opposite of true and not even close or a matter of interpretation. Americans will believe anything!

People are being deceived these days about so many subjects it's stunning...
 
And they sealed the indictment so no one could see it. Do they think DJT will flee to "Russia" if he knows what the charges are before he turns himself in? This really is banana republic tactics. We're going to arrest you but we are not going to tell you what for! I guess that is SOP for the Democrats. "you have to vote for the bill before you find out what's in it". Sadly, that is the way Congress always works. At best they read the talking points and then behind the scenes, they trade votes. I'll vote for your bill even though I have no idea what it is about if you vote for my bill.

Apparently, the leaks from the grand jury were all a plant.
Generally, all indictments remain sealed until before arrest or arraignment, in this case, Tuesday. That is the way the process works. There nothing unusual going on as far as the process is concerned.

A sealed indictment means the grand jury process is conducted in secret and the criminal charges have not been made public. Eventually, the criminal indictment will be unsealed and at that point, a warrant for the defendant's arrest is issued.

Traditionally, the grand jury has conducted its work in secret. Secrecy prevents those under scrutiny from fleeing or importuning the grand jurors, encourages full disclosure by witnesses, and protects the innocent from unwarranted prosecution, among other things.
 
Last edited:
Generally, all indictments remain sealed until before arrest or arraignment, in this case, Tuesday. That is the way the process works. There nothing unusual going on as far as the process is concerned.

A sealed indictment means the grand jury process is conducted in secret and the criminal charges have not been made public. Eventually, the criminal indictment will be unsealed and at that point, a warrant for the defendant's arrest is issued.

Traditionally, the grand jury has conducted its work in secret. Secrecy prevents those under scrutiny from fleeing or importuning the grand jurors, encourages full disclosure by witnesses, and protects the innocent from unwarranted prosecution, among other things.

But, it does appear that leaks have magically occurred from the prosecutor. The fact that those leaks were strategically beneficial to them is probably not a coincidence
 
What leaks? Show me a leak Do You have proof of leaks?
 
This meme pretty much sums it up

1680300185463.png
 
We could run around collecting tons of evidence but you will refuse to except it. The left gets off on making people prove the obvious.
 
We could run around collecting tons of evidence but you will refuse to except it. The left gets off on making people prove the obvious.
"Prove that's actually a woman!"
:LOL:

I just read a hilarious sentence on msnbc. I swear to god, it's like these people don't even hear the words that are coming out of their mouth.

MSNBC I find to be particularly high quality amusement, because it's not only radically left-wing but the writing quality is that of a 12 year old. They also struggle to come up with new stories and typically repeat the same headlines for weeks at a time.

Anyway, here is an author attempting to be persuasive in suggesting that Republicans have already concluded that the president is innocent.

Republicans have settled on a conclusion — the corrupt former president is pure as the driven snow — and they’re working backwards to justify their loyalty.

Never mind that they never seem to notice the first half of the sentence is a mirror image of what they're accusing the other side of. Just really made me laugh out loud
 
I simply asked for proof of a leak. So far, I see none.
 
In hockey parlance that shot was deflected way wide. I thought we were talking about leaks. I sense a bit of a subject shift. Show me the leak.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom