T-Dawg

Show me how it happened without one?
 
It's either a leak or the hose is dry. There's not a third option
 
I got my answer thanks.
 
We could run around collecting tons of evidence but you will refuse to except it. The left gets off on making people prove the obvious.
Like the proof that the election was stolen? Ha Ha - What proof? How much of that presented stood up?

Leak or speculation?
 
The point of this exercises is to expose the shear insanity of the left. You have no response because you drank the kool-aid. The left has a very narrow view of science and the right constantly exposes it.
 
The information got out but they don't want to admit it's a leak unless I literally show them something I think they physically expect water or something..

Oh now all of a sudden the liberals want to get literal with terms! :love:
 
I am sorry for you - you drank deep - the point of the exercise, from your point of view is simply to reinforce your preconceptions. There is no science in what is being discussed here. You are simply exposing your bias. If the conclusion is reached without evidence or in the face of it, then that is not a scientific approach.
 
I'm just a guy making random comments in the ether and for some reason, you're being triggered. Silly liberals.
 
🥳 We could throw a party (over) when the count is accepted as the count 😁
 
🥳 We could throw a party (over) when the count is accepted as the count 😁

The presidential races are won or lost in the large population centers and who controls the large population centers?

Believe me, when I say this I'm not a huge fan of republicans either. They don't have the killer instinct like liberals and it's a shame.
 
I am not a fan of either, either! The shame is the either/or thinking and the non-critical acceptance of misinformation.
 
1680322239690.png


 
Thanks AccessBlaster - so anonymous sources, and nothing really specific ... given that an indictment was issued what would you expect in the indictment? The story is what it is.
 
How would you say is right way of "thinking" then?
Well it certainly is not the us vs them thinking that is so prevalent at the moment. There is no (little) conceding of points in the politics we see, of seeing the other point of view and working through issues. Preconceptions and confirmation bias dominates. I would like to see a more critical/skeptical approach in general. We build from data / facts to knowledge and wisdom. However, it is not possible to use an entirely fact-based position. We have imperfect knowledge. At some point your morals / ethics and views (built from life experiences) must provide a filter - but it would be good to recognise when - and be prepared to change. Where do you stand?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom