It's either a leak or the hose is dry. There's not a third option
How what happened? Someone said there was a leak. I just want to see it.Show me how it happened without one?
Like the proof that the election was stolen? Ha Ha - What proof? How much of that presented stood up?We could run around collecting tons of evidence but you will refuse to except it. The left gets off on making people prove the obvious.
You can wait all you like - that is just tiresome obfuscation.Yeah, but I can define what a woman is, can you?
I'll wait.
Yes! like defining what a woman is. We finally agree...If the conclusion is reached without evidence or in the face of it, then that is not a scientific approach.
We could throw a party (over) when the count is accepted as the count
![]()
How would you say is right way of "thinking" then?The shame is the either/or thinking
Well it certainly is not the us vs them thinking that is so prevalent at the moment. There is no (little) conceding of points in the politics we see, of seeing the other point of view and working through issues. Preconceptions and confirmation bias dominates. I would like to see a more critical/skeptical approach in general. We build from data / facts to knowledge and wisdom. However, it is not possible to use an entirely fact-based position. We have imperfect knowledge. At some point your morals / ethics and views (built from life experiences) must provide a filter - but it would be good to recognise when - and be prepared to change. Where do you stand?How would you say is right way of "thinking" then?