The Narnia Code

[Rich]

What case?

It evolved over MILLIONS of years, not in seven days as the book of fairy tales quotes, stop being argumentative

 

[Mike375]

It evolved over MILLIONS of years, not in seven days as the book of fairy tales quotes, stop being argumentative

Billions, not millions. Try and get a grip of the facts for the argument you are trying to defend.

 

[Rich]

Billions, not millions. Try and get a grip of the facts for the argument you are trying to defend.

How many millions of years are there in billions?

 

[Mike375]

How many millions of years are there in billions?

It is obvious why the subject is beyond you.

 

[Rich]

It is obvious why the subject is beyond you.

and it's obvious why you have such narrow vision

 

[Rabbie]

Mike and Rabbie,

The Apollo astronauts left the both the earth and moon.

Mike375, Once again you miss the point of the analogy. Perhaps I should spell it out for you in simple words. The area of a sphere is finite. We can measure it. But a sphere has no edges so its surface is finite but unbounded. Now do you understand?

 

[Mike375]

Mike375, Once again you miss the point of the analogy. Perhaps I should spell it out for you in simple words. The area of a sphere is finite. We can measure it. But a sphere has no edges so its surface is finite but unbounded. Now do you understand?

You have missed the point. The sphere has ended at its surface. If an ant is walking around a tennis ball it can leave the tennis ball and walk across the floor. If a fly is walking around the tennis ball it can flap its wings and leave the tennis ball.

By the way, you could have used any shape, a cube or whatever. In fact you did not use a sphere as the moon and earth are not spheres.

 

[Mike375]

and it's obvious why you have such narrow vision

I don't think the earth or moon are spheres, so I have narrow vision???

 

[Mike375]

Like I said, I don't believe there is a set of rules that determines a sphere,

Are you serious?

 

[Mike375]

At the end of the day some of us think it just happened and others think that it was all part of a carefully thought-out plan. None of us actually knows for definite so it comes down to

which view you think is the most likely and requires the fewest assumptions or leaps of faith.

Given the Atheist movement likes to ignore science.......you have to go with supernatural.

But I still don't know why the atheist movement ignores science. Why, on this forum do atheists Alisa and Alc say "science is of no interest". This is not unique to them, the atheist forums are full of the same thing.

Rabbie and Mike Gurman are lost on "what is a sphere".....

Rich has "millions" confused with "billions" for when life started....

But if you want to see reinvention of science, science that does not exist, science that exists but does not exist......Richard Dawkin's site/forum....has it all I think Hawking needs to visit the site.

Let me tell you, Rich having no clue when life started and Rabbie and Mike Gurman having no clue as to what a sphere is.....None of that matters on the Richard Dawkins site......known as free science......

 

[Mike375]

Free science

 

[Mike375]

Where a cube can be anything you want...

http://richarddawkins.net/forum/

If anyone thought that atheism could be, maybe, possibly be...a religion.....First prize...it is

"I just finished reading Dawkins "The God Delusion", in which he talked about the correlation between level of education and atheism. i.e., more scientific/technical/educated populations have more atheists (that explains why there are so few atheists in U.S., just look at the educational system).
So lets have a poll. I know there are lots of educated people on this board. Are you an atheist? I'll start. I have always been an atheist (luckily born to non-religous parents), and have always found it incomprehensible that other people can bring themselves to believe there is some supernatural being in the sky responsible for our existence, despite an overwhelming lack of evidence to support that belief."

The new religion

 

[Rich]

If an ant is walking around a tennis ball it can leave the tennis ball and walk across the floor.

If it's covered in ice the ant can't even get on it, get a grip man, get a grip

 

[Rich]

Rich has "millions" confused with "billions" for when life started....

I chose not use the modern shortened term, that doesn't make me confused, you just can't use extended maths

 

[Mike375]

If it's covered in ice the ant can't even get on it, get a grip man, get a grip

You want to bet......

But I allowed for the English people's lack of knowledge on wildlife by incuding the fly.

If an ant is walking around a tennis ball it can leave the tennis ball and walk across the floor. If a fly is walking around the tennis ball it can flap its wings and leave the tennis ball.

Also note: I said tennis ball Again, your reading lets you down. The ant will be able to get on the tennis ball.

I am sure there are some basic science courses in England that will help both you and Rabbie. For example, Rabbie will learn what a sphere is. In fact I believe there are some basic courses for those people taking on atheism. I think The Atheist Foundation of Australia has a course.

These courses introduce science to atheists. As an example, after such a course people like Alisa and Alc could have an interest in the sciences.

Richard Dawkins of course offers something in the way of learning. It is all about the "new science".

 

[Mike375]

I chose not use the modern shortened term, that doesn't make me confused, you just can't use extended maths

You are not confused. You just don't know your subject. It is out of your depth.

There is no one in the science community would say life started Millions of years ago. It is Billions.....even expressed as 3.4 or 3.8 etc.

But if you want to keep making yourself look like an idiot....then keep going. On the other hand, since you are only "millions" of years ago you could be a potential recruit for the "born agains".

 

[Mike375]

I chose not use the modern shortened term, that doesn't make me confused, you just can't use extended maths

Holy shit, I forgot about the "new science"

Millions, billions, oygen.....none of it matters.

Any science is good science.......the "new science". We are lucky it is not the new religion

And what about those lies the "born agains" spread about an "atheist bus".

 

[Mike375]

And, go here

http://www.humanism.org.uk/home

The button at the top right for Donate is only there to make converts feel, familiar. There are no donations or fees accepted on that site

The "new science"

 

[Rich]

There is no one in the science community would say life started Millions of years ago. It is Billions.....even expressed as 3.4 or 3.8 etc.

You are not even close to being within the scientific community try again

 

[Rich]

There is no one in the science community would say life started Millions of years ago. It is Billions.....even expressed as 3.4 or 3.8 etc.

You can't even use the correct prefix, do try again when you've learnt simple maths