Welcome to the "awakening". It's repugnant when people distort "facts". That has also been an "awakening" form me. I ran across blatant unnecessary digs at Trump in the Handmaids coverage. I complained about it, the response was that published sources were being cited, which was true. A difficult situation when the source material is garbage itself. It's unfortunate when people distort "facts". Living in a free society, has "benefits" and "downsides". Occasionally that means having to live with "facts" without proper vetting. I Nevertheless, overall, Wikipedia serves a valuable public service.I used to think of Wikipedea as a fairly fact based neutral platform from which to get information. That is, unti l I found this:
Ran across this headline: Co-founder says Wikipedia's neutrality 'long gone,' cites leftist bias.I used to think of Wikipedea as a fairly fact based neutral platform from which to get information. That is, unti l I found this:
Just look at the "New Work Post reporting " and "Reactions" sections, and it is basically a one-sided story that looks like it came straight from CNN. I only looked this up because I saw an article in Breitbart and the purging of Conservative media since Trump got elected.
Silicon Valley has repeatedly proclaimed that Wikipedia is the best way to deal with “fake news” on their platforms. Co-founder Jimmy Wales and the Wikimedia Foundation that owns the site have touted its sourcing policies in agreement and been amplified by establishment media. Yet just as Big...www.breitbart.com
Very disheartening.“The days of Wikipedia’s robust commitment to neutrality are long gone,” Mr. Sanger told Fox News in a new interview. “Wikipedia’s ideological and religious bias is real and troubling, particularly in a resource that continues to be treated by many as an unbiased reference work.”
Mr. Sanger, 52, co-founded the site with Jimmy Wales in January 2001. He said Wikipedia’s turn away from neutrality is “disheartening.”
Republicans are Domestic Terrorists and I agree war must be declared on them.Laura Ingraham seems to have taken a much more assertive narrative that the Democrats are seeking to declare Republicans as the "Domestic Terrorists". The video below starts off discussing how those on the "left" falsely use race to inflame the public by (falsely) claiming that White people are the ones responsible for all the divisive hatred, which is what the left is actually promoting. However, starting at approximately the five (5) minute mark of the video, Laura slides into the discussion that the Democrats really don't care about violence since they avoid discussing violence being promulgated by the left. Finally, at approximately the six (6) minute mark of Laura's monologue she observes that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is beginning to suggest that the travel of "Domestic Extremists" may be monitored as part of the strategy that "Domestic Terrorism" is a security threat. Just before the seven (7) minute mark, Laura surmises that this is a preamble to declaring the Republicans as being declared the "Domestic Terrorists" by the Biden administration. (Biden has already set the stage for this. Biden in his inauguration speech, declared "war" on "Domestic Terrorism")
Wrong. The Democrats are the Domestic Terrorists. The Democrats, who you appear to be supporting, plan to implement a totalitarian state. From your delusional vitriol targeting Republicans you clearly do not believe in democracy and having a rationale discussion with those you disagree with. Please take your Trump Derangement medications,Republicans are Domestic Terrorists and I agree war must be declared on them.
BTW, I am white, fluent in 4 languages, and have lived in 9 different countries, some totalitarian.
Is that the best you can do?... Cat got your tongue?...Looks like you're out of words because all your arguments are feble.Please take your TDS medications. You will feel better.