W

Bodisathva said:
Absolutely. Better for you than beef. Much, much, cheaper. And let's not forget, it gives me the opportunity to spend time out in the woods, away from all of the idjits:D . My Grandfather taught me when I was very young, so for me, it's almost like I still get to spend that time with him.

We are a lucky few huh...

I didn't deer hunt with Granddad but he did take us squirrel and rabbit hunting....
 
nomorehype said:
That's not very 'sporting' if its stood still, is it? Couldn't you at least give it a running start?

Huh? It has the time from when it hears the gun go off until the bullet gets there to run, what else does it need, a gentle nudge with a stick?
 
KenHigg said:
Huh? It has the time from when it hears the gun go off until the bullet gets there to run, what else does it need, a gentle nudge with a stick?
sure...for the first two days. When have you seen anything standing still in the woods after the first two days of any season?:confused:
 
KenHigg said:
Huh? It has the time from when it hears the gun go off until the bullet gets there to run, what else does it need, a gentle nudge with a stick?
I bet it'd prefer a gun to shoot back with :)
 
Kraj said:
I, for one, can't wait to get me one of these babies!
Hmmm...the hunting uses for such a device appear somewhat limited...but I think I could come up with one or two other uses:eek:
 
Kraj said:
While much of the technology is a closely guarded secret, the firing mechanism has no moving parts. Instead, it uses electronic ballistics technology. Unlike other guns, the only parts which move are the bullets.

Sergeant: Private, there's a bomb coming. Fire the Metal Storm.
Private: Umm, Sarge? It says "Windows Protection Error. Please Restart The Application"
-- BOOM --
 
nomorehype said:
I bet it'd prefer a gun to shoot back with :)

Like these:

30.jpg
 
The really creepy thing about that picture is that in all probability those deer are actually posed corpses.
 
Kraj said:
The really creepy thing about that picture is that in all probability those deer are actually posed corpses.
Nah, they'll have been 'photoshopped' in afterwards
 
nomorehype said:
Nah, they'll have been 'photoshopped' in afterwards

They're shoulder mounts that are propped up from behind...:rolleyes:


taxidermy_6_006.jpg
 
Bodisathva said:
We really are the warmongering, country annexing, global domination machine they fear us to be,

An educated American, that's a rarity:eek:
 
dan-cat said:
Doesn't stop the UK from asking for a little help in protecting some rock-pile in the South Atlantic either does it? It's called D-I-P-L-O-M-A-C-Y.

Trouble is you didn't quite grasp the concept then, still don't over 25yrs later:rolleyes:
 
Kraj said:
...
You might find yourself consistently shocked at the quality of discourse you'd find from us "Merkins" when you appraoch us like a reasonable human being instead of.... whatever you are.
Odd, that wasn't there the first time I saw the post. Oh hang on,
Last edited by...
So what do you do, go back and edit a post when some new barb occurs to you?
 
nomorehype said:
And /why/?
Well it's really quite simple
A/ It's written on a scrap over paper that's several centuries out of date that they can, (they call it their constitution, or some such drivel, it does away with the need for a government)

B/ It's to prevent the church taking control of their country, which is kind of odd because plastered all over their currency is "In god we trust" :rolleyes:
 
ColinEssex said:
As I recall, the UK did ask for US help in the Falklands war, but it was turned down as being a UK issue not a US issue.;)

Col

if i remember right they did give us the sidewinder missile which was brand spanking new technology in those days....that along with the argentinian air force's reluctance to engage the harriers in combat allowed us to blow most of their planes out the sky with next to no losses for our air force.
 
KenHigg said:
They're shoulder mounts that are propped up from behind...:rolleyes:
Yep, that's what I figured. That's counts as a corpse in my book. :D

nomorehype said:
So what do you do, go back and edit a post when some new barb occurs to you?
Yes, as long as no one has posted after me. That is how one is supposed to behaive, as opposed to your penchant for posting multiple times in a row, which is referred to as 'spamming', or as I call it: 'lazy'.
 
Kraj said:
Yes, as long as no one has posted after me.
Several had. At least one had quoted you. You'll forgive me for thinking that its rather sad to go back and change something later, wont you?
Kraj said:
That is how one is supposed to behaive, as opposed to your penchant for posting multiple times in a row, which is referred to as 'spamming', or as I call it: 'lazy'.
Ummm, its 'lazy' to post more than once in a row? Sigh, more utter b*ll*cks...
(Don't worry if its not allowed to say b*ll*cks - I'll go back and edit it out later ;) )
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom