W (1 Viewer)

ShaneMan said:
Why should the US rebuke a country defending itself?
How is bunging rockets into civilian populations "defending itself"?
 
nomorehype said:
How is bunging rockets into civilian populations "defending itself"?
That's the American way too, I wonder why we didn't blow up Northern Ireland just because a small number of terrorists were based there? :rolleyes:
 
Rich said:
That's the American way too, I wonder why we didn't blow up Northern Ireland just because a small number of terrorists were based there? :rolleyes:

After 51 pages, and my absence for a month; you still can’t seem to sort out the facts from your distorted point of view.

Well done old chap.

And once again Richard the United States did NOT take Texas from Mexico. Please try to get this one fact straight.

General Santa Anna invited the Anglos to Texas to settle it and grow the economy. After a prolonged war with Spain he decided to change the rules and began pressing the Texans. So they naturally resisted.

After his cowardly, failed, attempt at evading capture during the battle at San Jacinto, he acquiesced and SOLD Texas its independents.

Several years later Texas joined the Union as a State.
 
Last edited:
jsanders said:
After 51 pages, and my absence for a month; you still can’t seem to sort out the facts from your distorted point of view.
I was wondering where you've been. What have you been doing with yourself?
 
jsanders said:
After 51 pages, and my absence for a month; you still can’t seem to sort out the facts from your distorted point of view.

Well done old chap.

And once again Richard the United States did NOT take Texas from Mexico. Please try to get this one fact straight.

General Santa Anna invited the Anglos to Texas to settle it and grow the economy. After a prolonged war with Spain he decided to change the rules and began pressing the Texans. So they naturally resisted.

After his cowardly, failed, attempt at evading capture during the battle at San Jacinto, he acquiesced and SOLD Texas its independents.

Several years later Texas joined the Union as a State.

Good to see ya back
 
jsanders said:
After 51 pages, and my absence for a month; you still can’t seem to sort out the facts from your distorted point of view.

Well done old chap.

And once again Richard the United States did NOT take Texas from Mexico. Please try to get this one fact straight.

General Santa Anna invited the Anglos to Texas to settle it and grow the economy. After a prolonged war with Spain he decided to change the rules and began pressing the Texans. So they naturally resisted.

After his cowardly, failed, attempt at evading capture during the battle at San Jacinto, he acquiesced and SOLD Texas its independents.

Several years later Texas joined the Union as a State.

What are you blathering about now and who mentioned Texas ?:rolleyes:
 
Rich said:
What are you blathering about now and who mentioned Texas ?:rolleyes:

You’re slipping old man. Do you think maybe the gins getting the better of you?


Rich said:
Well let's see, everybody elses version of Christianity, love thine enemy as thine own and turn the other cheek, Thow shalt not kill. :cool:

The American version, let's bomb the bast*rds, thow shalt not murder, unless you're sure of getting away with it under the statute of limitations :rolleyes:



Rich said:
My God, it's worse than I thought, would you like a definitive list? :rolleyes:

ShaneMan said:
Yes, please.

Rich said:
Where to start:confused: :rolleyes:
Iran, Cuba, 'Nam, South America, Iraq, China, Russia, Afghanistan, Hawaii, The Phillipines, Iran, (again) Texas, The West Indies
 
jsanders said:
You’re slipping old man. Do you think maybe the gins getting the better of you?
I don't drink gin and which part of the quotes you've posted do you have a problem understanding ?
 
Rich said:
I don't drink gin and which part of the quotes you've posted do you have a problem understanding ?

No more than say, a human, would lack the ability to observe an ant.

I was merely pointing out that your unrelenting reference to The US "taking" Texas is fundamentally flawed, and your persistent exertions diminishes all the rest of your holier- than- thou post.

Just thought you would want to maintain your omniscience.
 
jsanders said:
I was merely pointing out that your unrelenting reference to The US "taking" Texas is fundamentally flawed,
I mentioned it once, have you been drinking ?:rolleyes:
now what problem do you have regarding Americas gun ho method with international politics
 
nomorehype said:
How is bunging rockets into civilian populations "defending itself"?

because thats where the missiles, that are being fired into their country, which came before Isreal fired anything, are coming from.
 
ShaneMan said:
because thats where the missiles, that are being fired into their country, which came before Isreal fired anything, are coming from.
Odd, I thought that the first missiles came in the opposite direction
 
nomorehype said:
Odd, I thought that the first missiles came in the opposite direction

Does anyone actually know when the shooting started; any more I tent to disbelieve everyone connected to the facts.

It's a sad commentary when everything you hear has to be put on trial.
 
nomorehype said:
Odd, I thought that the first missiles came in the opposite direction

You do? What/who would make you have these thoughts?

Are the Israeli soldiers, that they are saying were kidnapped, are they just lost and that never happened either?
 
ShaneMan said:
Are the Israeli soldiers, that they are saying were kidnapped, are they just lost and that never happened either?

No more so than the suspects Israel is holding in its prisons at the minute
 
and today Israel targets an International Red Cross convoy (an act in direct contravention of the GC) but still the a$$hole Bush refuses to condemn them.
 
nomorehype said:
and today Israel targets an International Red Cross convoy (an act in direct contravention of the GC) but still the a$$hole Bush refuses to condemn them.
And why would he? Seems like they deserve it. Israel needs to take Labenon, and then be done with it. Israel taking Arab countries, America taking Arab countries, pretty soon they won't have anyplace to go :rolleyes: Go Israel.
 
FoFa said:
And why would he? Seems like they deserve it. Israel needs to take Labenon, and then be done with it. Israel taking Arab countries, America taking Arab countries, pretty soon they won't have anyplace to go :rolleyes: Go Israel.
Just try to remember your post next time you find skyscrapers used as runways and everyone is whining "whaddid we do?" and "why does everyone hate us so bad?"...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom