When does the winning start?

What would be your recommendation for a good source?
A variety of sources to start with. You should should always look for an AP, News Week, or a Reuters report, The Wall Street Journal has high quality reporting.

So quote the sensationalized propaganda, but also anchor it with real journalism and information. I'm not taking a stand on Left vs Right. yall do that enough without me.
 
A variety of sources to start with. You should should always look for an AP, News Week, or a Reuters report, The Wall Street Journal has high quality reporting.

So quote the sensationalized propaganda, but also anchor it with real journalism and information. I'm not taking a stand on Left vs Right. yall do that enough without me.
No need to go negative, I just wondering
 
AP, News Week, or a Reuters report, The Wall Street Journal has high quality reporting.
The younger demographic isn't even aware of these reporting services. The future will be defined by devices other than television or news print. The legacy media is on life support, just my opinion.
 
You know, if you chose reputable news sources to quote your message might be better received.
Provide a list of what you believe to be supposedly reputable news sources. How are they different from what what Fox News is reporting?
Finally, why should we accept your opinion as to what constitutes a reputable news source? Are you the arbitrator of the truth?
As some like to say: My "truth" is what is valid so whatever you say is not valid.
 
I guess even bothering to make an equality statement is what irks me.
Any compromise, any logic, any fact, not from extreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeem right, seems to irk you. I don't think I remember anyone as far into Thamp Land as you are, like serious Jim Jones stuff here.

Fif it, don't fix it, I don't have a horse in that race, but you might consider at least acknowledging it.

You wanna know why you stopped believing to the WSJ? That's easy, they broke the story of the criminal withholding of Ukrainian war effort funds before the first Trump impeachment Trial.

I have not seen a single word of doubt about any of your deeply held beliefs that you have been willing to doubt. At least not publically.
 
Provide a list of what you believe to be supposedly reputable news sources. How are they different from what what Fox News is reporting?
Finally, why should we accept your opinion as to what constitutes a reputable news source? Are you the arbitrator of the truth?
As some like to say: My "truth" is what is valid so whatever you say is not valid.
See above.
 
The younger demographic isn't even aware of these reporting services. The future will be defined by devices other than television or news print. The legacy media is on life support, just my opinion.
But that in no way makes them less legitimate. That's like when you asked your mom if you jump off the bridge, and your 4th grade response to her refusal to capitulate was to say the other kids are doing it. I haven't been missing this.
 
Not if you think the linked article was "sensationalized propaganda". Were there falsehoods or exaggerations? Was the article rife with "purple" words? Was it not actually newsworthy?
You don't really hear the language of the even the headlines, they sound normal to you. Jones Town propaganda.
 
Any compromise, any logic, any fact, not from extreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeem right, seems to irk you. I don't think I remember anyone as far into Thamp Land as you are, like serious Jim Jones stuff here.

Fif it, don't fix it, I don't have a horse in that race, but you might consider at least acknowledging it.

You wanna know why you stopped believing to the WSJ? That's easy, they broke the story of the criminal withholding of Ukrainian war effort funds before the first Trump impeachment Trial.

I have not seen a single word of doubt about any of your deeply held beliefs that you have been willing to doubt. At least not publically.
I'm confused. Isn't it BIDEN that withheld money from Ukraine until they fired the guy that was investigating his son?
 
I'm confused. Isn't it BIDEN that withheld money from Ukraine until they fired the guy that was investigating his son?
Trump did it, but his legal team managed to erode the spirit of the Constitution even further. Making every act committed by the president uncountable.
 
Last edited:
Trumps still on a role. Both Mexico and Canada have temporarily agreed with Trump's demands.


As a successful side note: The elimination of DEI, as one of Trump's goals, has been gathering steam.
 
It's a step in the right direction but, The NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell is still supporting DEI
 
I guess if anyone on the planet hasn't seen that video of Biden bragging, it would be you or you've conveniently forgotten.
I thought my memory hadn't failed it - Biden withheld foreign aid until they fired the guy who was investigating his son, essentially. This must not have circulated on mainstream media all that much or everyone would know
 
Trump gets his cabinet. (y)
Hopefully Patel will clean-out the FBI. The FBI that abused the FISA process and raided Mar-a-Lago; all for the benefit of the Democratic party. Comey, while he was the FBI Director, used the FBI to get General Flynn and also attempted to get Trump (but that failed). Though Comey's targeted attack on Trump failed, the Democrats were able through lawfare to obstruct Trump from effectively running the country. Trump, learned and this time he is immediately cleaning house so that he can run the country with minimal Democratic party obstruction.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom