NauticalGent
Ignore List Poster Boy
- Local time
- Yesterday, 23:42
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2015
- Messages
- 7,094
Absolutely, all the more reason to heed my suggestion.Denial and arrogant behaviour contributes to AWF's problem.
Absolutely, all the more reason to heed my suggestion.Denial and arrogant behaviour contributes to AWF's problem.
Show me the stats that show causation rather than correlation.Several of you have difficulty recognising that toxic content is a significant contributor to AWF's decline.
Several ofSeveral of you have difficulty recognising that toxic content is a significant contributor to AWF's decline. In the past 6 months I have only seen the same handful of active members, minus 2 and counting. Go figure.
It is possible to be toxic by continuously complaining about toxicity.Several of you have difficulty recognising that toxic content is a significant contributor to AWF's decline. In the past 6 months I have only seen the same handful of active members, minus 2 and counting. Go figure.
You DO realize that the odds are very high that the inactive members will remain inactive and thus not answer your poll question?Perhaps you can post a poll to find out the reasons why many members have remained inactive?
Thanks, "Bruce"The more reason for further analises. Several cannot all be wrong. Start a poll on the topic. There's nothing good about preserving toxic content in plain view. I think AWF would be better off removing it.
As in "Ruperto"? If so, this is like a bad case of herpes...No thanks Frank.
I can't remember where I heard the rumour from. It might just be a rumour.Speculation based on @cheekybuddha and others insinuations? I am going to contact Frank to find out more.
So maybe you should spend more time there to avoid this toxic environment. The rest of us will weather out our Stockholm Syndrome in your absence...You don't see sites like Stack Exchange and GitHub tolerating toxic social content.
To summarize: I've learned nothing about toxicity, and will continue to give Jon unsolicited business advice.To summarise, I think AWF would be better off limiting its content to technical related posts. You don't see sites like Stack Exchange and GitHub tolerating insults, arrogance, personal attacks, bullying, trolling, and entitlement.
It IS mind boggling how he has managed to keep AWF up and running for so long...To summarize: I've learned nothing about toxicity, and will continue to give Jon unsolicited business advice.
I doubt it, Frank was MUCH more annoying than "Bruce", but you never know...Don't even THINK about telling me that is Frank from UA fame?! Uhhhhh
I hope you're wrong
You literally don't even want to know. Frank was just an awful persona that terrorized UA for years but I don't think this is Frank, thank GodI was trying to solve the puzzle "Who Frank is?" And all of a sudden "Bruce" joined too.
Hmmm...You literally don't even want to know. Frank was just an awful persona that terrorized UA for years but I don't think this is Frank, thank God