- Local time
- Today, 19:49
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2003
- Messages
- 17,499
Batshit Bonkers Brittain
- Thread starter Uncle Gizmo
- Start date
Cotswold
Well-known member
- Local time
- Today, 19:49
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2020
- Messages
- 960
That's a good name for Crazy Sturgeon. The last remaining Scottish fishwife.
She's' often been likened to the little one in the Krankies. She's not unlike the terrible Calman woman, maybe her cousin?
Murrell was married to the fish lady for 20 years apparently, what a delight that must have been. I wonder who'll keep the camper van?
Ronnie O'Sullivan is a bit like Sturgeon. When either of them open their mouth all they do is complain.
She's' often been likened to the little one in the Krankies. She's not unlike the terrible Calman woman, maybe her cousin?
Murrell was married to the fish lady for 20 years apparently, what a delight that must have been. I wonder who'll keep the camper van?
Ronnie O'Sullivan is a bit like Sturgeon. When either of them open their mouth all they do is complain.
AccessBlaster
Registered User.
- Local time
- Today, 11:49
- Joined
- May 22, 2010
- Messages
- 7,763
- Local time
- Today, 19:49
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2003
- Messages
- 17,499
Drill Baby Drill
- Local time
- Today, 19:49
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2003
- Messages
- 17,499
Re KT Hopkins... I love women with brains and balls!
Correction:- I love biological women with brains & balls!
Correction:- I love biological women with brains & balls!
- Local time
- Today, 19:49
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2003
- Messages
- 17,499
Listen to this young lady, she's got her head screwed on right!!!
Kier Starmer, lookout, this is what a Prime Minister should sound like!
Kier Starmer, lookout, this is what a Prime Minister should sound like!
- Local time
- Today, 19:49
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2003
- Messages
- 17,499
Latest from the UK:-
Cotswold
Well-known member
- Local time
- Today, 19:49
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2020
- Messages
- 960
The USA had Biden as deputy, who then became leader.
They say that what happens in the US, happens here five years later. What can we do to prevent history repeating itself?
When Starmer is skiving off somewhere, this is who is in charge. Trouble is Starmer appears frightened of her. If Raynor says jump, he says how high?
Don't know what Biden did but previously this one worked in a care home.
They say that what happens in the US, happens here five years later. What can we do to prevent history repeating itself?
When Starmer is skiving off somewhere, this is who is in charge. Trouble is Starmer appears frightened of her. If Raynor says jump, he says how high?
Don't know what Biden did but previously this one worked in a care home.
Last edited:
Cotswold
Well-known member
- Local time
- Today, 19:49
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2020
- Messages
- 960
Believe it or not but this isn't a joke, or misinformation.
When someone makes up this rubbish to justify spending £532,000 and isn't sacked they can only be working for the government.
Basically they have switched CHR(46) with CHR(263) and issued an invoice for £523,000. Certainly beats working.
The Whitehall communications diktat explains the significance of the dot in the logo for GOV.UK, the Government’s main website, with detailed instructions on its “brand guidelines”.
As part of a rebrand of the site, the full stop between the words “GOV” and “UK” has been moved upwards from its position at the bottom of the letters to halfway between them. The idea is explained in the guidance as a “concept” that can act as
“the bridge between government and the UK, by the side of users to help make information and services easier and more useful”.
The guide adds: “Used within our wordmark and as a graphic device across all GOV.UK channels, the dot is a guiding hand for life.”
The dot is a circle on a background of a different colour, and will be used in graphics for government services.
www.publictechnology.net
All of us in the UK are so thankful and simply amazed at this huge technological advancement. We are truly World leaders in the use of a dot.
When someone makes up this rubbish to justify spending £532,000 and isn't sacked they can only be working for the government.
Basically they have switched CHR(46) with CHR(263) and issued an invoice for £523,000. Certainly beats working.
The Whitehall communications diktat explains the significance of the dot in the logo for GOV.UK, the Government’s main website, with detailed instructions on its “brand guidelines”.
As part of a rebrand of the site, the full stop between the words “GOV” and “UK” has been moved upwards from its position at the bottom of the letters to halfway between them. The idea is explained in the guidance as a “concept” that can act as
“the bridge between government and the UK, by the side of users to help make information and services easier and more useful”.
The guide adds: “Used within our wordmark and as a graphic device across all GOV.UK channels, the dot is a guiding hand for life.”
The dot is a circle on a background of a different colour, and will be used in graphics for government services.
GDS unveils colourful £500k refresh of GOV.UK
Monochrome logo replaced with more blue, with a redesign that government hopes ‘works for everyone’, while other new features, such as animation, to become evident on incoming app and wallet The Government Digital Service has unveiled a redesign of the GOV.UK logo and text that introduces col
www.publictechnology.net
All of us in the UK are so thankful and simply amazed at this huge technological advancement. We are truly World leaders in the use of a dot.
Isaac
Lifelong Learner
- Local time
- Today, 11:49
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2017
- Messages
- 11,405
What asci character can even do that? I guess extended character 183 according to the Internet. Alt+0183
That's truly ridiculous
They expect people to still visit the website? 90% of the users won't have any idea how to type it out
That's truly ridiculous
They expect people to still visit the website? 90% of the users won't have any idea how to type it out
Isaac
Lifelong Learner
- Local time
- Today, 11:49
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2017
- Messages
- 11,405
Ahh. Okay. That is a lot more believeable. I'm picturing millions of people typing gov·uk - in fact that just took me 3 tries LOL
Cotswold
Well-known member
- Local time
- Today, 19:49
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2020
- Messages
- 960
Three or four years ago some dopy squaddie sent an email with a spreadsheet attachment containing details of Afghans who had worked for the army during the occupation of Afghanistan. Apparently the army stores private and secret details in spreadsheets with the understanding that they are somehow encrypted when in Excel. Having sent the email - not once but twice just to make sure. Another dope further up the chain discovered that the Afghans now had a copy and were systematically working their way through the list and were popping them. Then another dope even higher up decided that they'd stop this by inviting thousands of Afghans to come and retire in Britain where they'd be given money, houses, phones, cars etc. in perpetuity. In other words just about anything they asked for. Then another dope even higher up obtained a super injunction to keep this fiasco out of the press and media. Recently another group of dopes in the government had the injunction lifted and all hell broke loose when it was stated that it was all to cost £7billion. Worse just about every politician and civil servant is at a loss as to how they can email government secrets if they can't use spreadsheets. They all believed a spreadsheet was a secure and encrypted database. All of these guys of course believe that IT and software starts and ends with Word and Excel. Because that is the limit of their knowledge. They think that they understand AI, for no other reason than their own intelligence is artificial. So this is where we are.
Exactly how is it OK to pardon Irish terrorists and also provide support, houses and money for Afghans who worked for the UK? The Afghans were well paid for the work 'they' chose to do at the time. How many cases are there that we have now basically given free pardons to those who are murderers and/or rapists who are now turning our towns into no-go-areas and filling our jails? Not only that we are denying, or removing our own veteran soldiers from their accommodation and giving it to these Afghans. Literally to thousands of them, a figure of 7,000 plus is bandied about. Which seems an extraordinary number.
Then at the same time the government is pursuing with vigour and determination in prosecuting our own soldiers who followed the orders of their superiors when the government sent them to Northern Ireland to take part in a war. And this is after our government gave pardons to all Irish terrorists involved in the very same war. Regardless of their crimes.
This is 21st Century Britain
Exactly how is it OK to pardon Irish terrorists and also provide support, houses and money for Afghans who worked for the UK? The Afghans were well paid for the work 'they' chose to do at the time. How many cases are there that we have now basically given free pardons to those who are murderers and/or rapists who are now turning our towns into no-go-areas and filling our jails? Not only that we are denying, or removing our own veteran soldiers from their accommodation and giving it to these Afghans. Literally to thousands of them, a figure of 7,000 plus is bandied about. Which seems an extraordinary number.
Then at the same time the government is pursuing with vigour and determination in prosecuting our own soldiers who followed the orders of their superiors when the government sent them to Northern Ireland to take part in a war. And this is after our government gave pardons to all Irish terrorists involved in the very same war. Regardless of their crimes.
This is 21st Century Britain
