QI (quite interesting)

No that's the cause of the coldest winter on record, or was it the floods, no it's the drought , oops I forgot it to blame for everything:rolleyes:
Surely Bliar has to take the blame for something:D
 
Had to chuckle at the person visiting Tel Aviv and thinking it was in the Canary Islands. But there is maybe about a fraction of a percent of an excuse for the confusion because I seem to recall from the USA's orbital manned launches in the 1960's that there was a tracking station at Tanarive. Tanarive, Tel Aviv... pretty close.

Folks understand that the USA has 50 entities that might as well be lumped together as states plus Puerto Rico is a commonwealth member - also called a protectorate. The Pacific Islands are like that, too. But here is something that you might not realize. The USA is an interesting and sometimes touchy amalgam of a nation and an agglomeration of states. I think I've seen some articles about the European Union going through a few of the same kinds of pain.

For instance, there is a VERY serious discussion as to whether certain United Nations treaties with the Federal government of the USA apply to the state governments. No, I'm not kidding, and yes, it is a serious discussion. The state of Texas convicted someone and executed him, or at least was going to, but it turned out he was a Mexican national. Texas had not contacted the Mexican Embassy and some U.N. types were going ballistic about denying the man his rights. To which Texas replied (technically correctly) "We didn't sign the treaty. He commited a non-federal crime. We've got him. We're going to punish him." (Or words to that effect.)

Take a look at the furor going on with Arizona and their laws on illegal aliens and identification papers. That is about immigration, a federal issue, but the state has made it their own.

And every time I turn around, it is things like that incident that prove to me I should have been a lawyer. The money to be made in lawsuits after the BP spill? The question is whether BP will bleed money faster than it is bleeding oil in the Gulf of Mexico right now. I don't want to get started, though. I'll just rant and rave all night, and it is already too close to my bedtime for me to get spun up again on this topic.
 
Had to chuckle at the person visiting Tel Aviv and thinking it was in the Canary Islands. But there is maybe about a fraction of a percent of an excuse for the confusion because I seem to recall from the USA's orbital manned launches in the 1960's that there was a tracking station at Tanarive. Tanarive, Tel Aviv... pretty close.

.

Did you mean Tenerife?

Brian
 
... Texas had not contacted the Mexican Embassy and some U.N. types were going ballistic about denying the man his rights...

And let's not bat an eyelid for the human rights of the victims!! :mad:
 
And where do these human rights come from? Is there some kind of universal law that codifies them?
 
And where do these human rights come from? Is there some kind of universal law that codifies them?
Yes it's called the Geneva Convention, which of course the US refuses to abide by
 
So then these are not universal human rights, but negotiated rights that only apply to a subset of humans existing on this planet. I get it now.
 
The Geneva Conventions are treaties regarding conduct of nations at war. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is the treaty which covers human rights in general.
 
And by the by... the Geneva Conventions (there are actually four of them) address treatment of individuals during times of war or conflict between nations. I was not aware that the US was at war with Mexico.
 
The Geneva Conventions are treaties regarding conduct of nations at war. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is the treaty which covers human rights in general.


I think you mean the International Bill of Human Rights (which includes the UDHR) as adopted by the United Nations General Assembly and which is not binding on any nation...
 
And let's not bat an eyelid for the human rights of the victims!! :mad:

Victims have rights? You wouldn't know it in the U.S. It seems that everything has swung towards giving the perpetrator rights so that we don't treat them bad (heaven forbid we should treat someone who has murdered, stolen, raped, etc. bad). That would be INHUMANE, according to the rules to which many activist judges have determined need to be adhered.

It is getting to be such that inmates even get to watch cable tv instead of sitting for hours with nothing to do. I can't afford cable, but they get it.

The only jail that has it going anywhere right is in Arizona where Sheriff Joe Arpaio runs things. And yet he keeps coming under fire for supposedly violating the prisoners Constitutional rights. If all inmates were treated the way he does it there would be much fewer returning prisoners (his record on this is pretty clear that he has a fairly low recurrence rate because either the criminals stop doing the stuff or they move somewhere else where it is cushy to be in jail. So if all were like his, then there would be no place to escape to)
 
No that one finished when you pinched Texas from them

I'd say look in the mirror but in the case of England, they went out and conquered half the world but couldn't keep it. You're just jealous that we were able to keep it. :D
 
I'd say look in the mirror but in the case of England, they went out and conquered half the world but couldn't keep it. You're just jealous that we were able to keep it. :D


So far... Predictions are that more than 60% of Americans will be Spanish-speaking by 2025...
 
I live in central California and there are a number of billboards that are spanish only. Now where did I leave that spanish to english dictionary?
 
Brian, Tenerife is possibly what I remembered. I was responding off-the-cuff late at night at the time, being too lazy to look it up before posting. In fact, that was the last post before I woke up with "QWERTY" on my forehead.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom