Ron Paul

Well that doesn't appear to be a very Christian answer, am I missing something here?:confused:

Can you name a country that has had interference from a foreign power in an internal dispute and everything has gone smoothly and peacable from then on? I'm not saying it hasn't happened I just can't think of the occasion.

Brian
 
Can you name a country that has had interference from a foreign power in an internal dispute and everything has gone smoothly and peacable from then on? I'm not saying it hasn't happened I just can't think of the occasion.

Brian

Pitcairn......................................
 
That's why due to zone laws many Yanks aren't allowed to benefit from it:rolleyes:

the guys in California - seems to be on the cutting edge of technology in regards to solar - because they have more of it .

some of the Hippies "yanks" have other advances in eco technology -
energy from Cow shit ..-

and while this may not be there invention - - some US guys have used this technology -
 
Pitcairn......................................

Is Pitcairn independent? I seem to remember some under aged sex scandal a few years ago that involved our judiciary looking at it.

Brian
 
The look after us first part.........

I'm pretty sure I know what your getting at but my answer would be I think what I said could still fall under being a "Christian answer." The apostle Paul taught to take care of your immediate family and home and once those needs are met to then go to the next level of family (for lack of better words) and then once your families needs are met, to look to your neighbors and he finishes with so that they will not be a burden on the church. I don't think America is meeting the needs of it's "immediate" family. You asked and brought up the "Christian" aspect so don't snap back at me.:D
 
I'm pretty sure I know what your getting at but my answer would be I think what I said could still fall under being a "Christian answer." The apostle Paul taught to take care of your immediate family and home and once those needs are met to then go to the next level of family (for lack of better words) and then once your families needs are met, to look to your neighbors and he finishes with so that they will not be a burden on the church. I don't think America is meeting the needs of it's "immediate" family. You asked and brought up the "Christian" aspect so don't snap back at me.:D

But I thought the Christian ethos was love thy neighbour as thine own? isn't there a conflict of interests there?:confused:
 
But I thought the Christian ethos was love thy neighbour as thine own? isn't there a conflict of interests there?:confused:

It certainly could be. I think what Paul was getting at in writing what he did was this, as an example. I work with handicapped children. A large portion of the kids that I see come from poor families and while I'm in their homes I see so many things that I would like to do for them, buy for them, but I have a problem. I don't have enough money to do what I would like to do. What if I decided to go ahead and spend what money I do have on helping these families, at the sacrifice of my own family. Once I do that, now my family becomes a burden to someone else (maybe). I think the principle that Paul was teaching was to make sure that you have taken care of matters within your own home before you start looking to meet the needs of others. On the other hand, folks have to be careful not to carry this to the extent of becoming selfish thus the "love thy neighbor as thyself" comes into play, however it also means much more than just monetary. America has poor in her own country, that are being neglected, but we will travel around the world meeting the needs of others, who in the long run, don't appear to appreciate what has been done for them. More like it's expected.
 
It certainly could be. I think what Paul was getting at in writing what he did was this, as an example. I work with handicapped children. A large portion of the kids that I see come from poor families and while I'm in their homes I see so many things that I would like to do for them, buy for them, but I have a problem. I don't have enough money to do what I would like to do. What if I decided to go ahead and spend what money I do have on helping these families, at the sacrifice of my own family. Once I do that, now my family becomes a burden to someone else (maybe). I think the principle that Paul was teaching was to make sure that you have taken care of matters within your own home before you start looking to meet the needs of others. On the other hand, folks have to be careful not to carry this to the extent of becoming selfish thus the "love thy neighbor as thyself" comes into play, however it also means much more than just monetary. America has poor in her own country, that are being neglected, but we will travel around the world meeting the needs of others, who in the long run, don't appear to appreciate what has been done for them. More like it's expected.

Very well Shane, couldn't have said it better myself. I have often thought of that myself. The world shouldn't judge all Americans as being gready, just the people that run it.

Nice...
 
Very well Shane, couldn't have said it better myself. I have often thought of that myself. The world shouldn't judge all Americans as being gready, just the people that run it.

Nice...

Thank you, Sir.
 
Very well Shane, couldn't have said it better myself. I have often thought of that myself. The world shouldn't judge all Americans as being gready, just the people that run it.

Nice...

Especially the current bunch:rolleyes:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom