I grew up as a free range child so constraints bother me. But even by the age of 4 I understood that I couldn't wander off without upsetting my mother. I understand that society imposes constraints that keep us from impinging on the rights of others and I'm good with that. If I never mow my lawn or blast music when most others are sleeping, I'm going to get in trouble. So, I behave. That is part of the socialization we all go through as children. We learn how to live with others. But that is a far cry from the government being able to freeze my bank account because they don't like my opinion. Or put me in jail for a minor, non jail offence because they want time to investigate me and my associates in the hope they can charge me with a serious crime.
I think Jon should be able to drive as fast as he wants when he is alone in the car on an empty road. In the US, he'd probably get away with it because there are not cameras and speed traps on all roads. He probably wouldn't get away with it on a limited access toll road because, the time between point a and point b is known and if you get to b too early, it was because you were breaking the law. Many cities are installing cameras at all intersections so they can raise money by sending traffic tickets when you run a light or commit some other infraction. I sure wish they'd ticket the people going into and out of Sikorsky who insist on blocking the box and tying up traffic. But I still think that this isn't fair. I really dislike the surveillance state. It may help to solve crimes - at least on TV but I'd rather not be surveilled as I'm going about my daily business. Cities are not putting up the cameras at intersections to stop crime, they're doing it as a revenue generator.