A textbook definition of cowardice

Something about war, death & charts comes accross as a bit belittling...:o
 
For Colin and Rich to understand you, you have to speak in a way they will understand, so belittling seems the way to go. :p
 
:confused:
When I was at school Moscow was in Europe, and therefore part of the USSR was in Europe,, when did it move?

Brian
 
dan-cat said:
Here's that chart again...
entire_war_sm.gif


Sorry - you've lost me with the chart - what are you trying to prove? I got a headache trying to follow the cross-Atlantic war of words
 
Brianwarnock said:
:confused:
When I was at school Moscow was in Europe, and therefore part of the USSR was in Europe,, when did it move?

Brian
That was my memory as well, plus half (or so) of Europe belonged the them at one time anyway.
 
jsanders said:
They sure wanted to be, Oh i remember now, we kept that from happening.
Here we go, next you'll be taking the credit for ending communist rule and replacing it with the Russian mafia:rolleyes:
 
dan-cat said:
I'd still like to know how a product of UK education could describe the protagonists of the Vietnam war as thus:



Here's that chart again...

entire_war_sm.gif

Not really sure why you have such a problem with this Daniella

Nondescript
Lacking distinctive qualities; having no individual character or form
 
Can you give me a female name too, Rich? Pretty please?
 
nikkypickles said:
Sorry - you've lost me with the chart - what are you trying to prove? I got a headache trying to follow the cross-Atlantic war of words

GWB is demonized 'cos of Iraq, Afghanistan etc etc.

Losses in Iraq pale in comparision to Vietnam.

I wanted to understand why LBJ and JFK aren't demonized too?
Why the discrepancy?
 
Rich said:
Not really sure why you have such a problem with this Daniella

Nondescript
Lacking distinctive qualities; having no individual character or form

Rule for GWB: Use of foreign policy to demonize allowed
Rule for LBJ: Use of foreign policy to demonize not allowed? :confused:
 
dan-cat said:
Rule for GWB: Use of foreign policy to demonize allowed
Rule for LBJ: Use of foreign policy to demonize not allowed? :confused:
No I was sure I'd already explained this to you, but here goes again, LBJ was drawn further into a war that he didn't start, after he'd bumped off JFK, of course.
Bush sought and got elected on a pledge to invade Iraq for a regime change
 
dan-cat said:
GWB is demonized 'cos of Iraq, Afghanistan etc etc.

Losses in Iraq pale in comparision to Vietnam.

I wanted to understand why LBJ and JFK aren't demonized too?
Why the discrepancy?

Can I take a stab at this?

The rest of the world, ie Europe, was not dragged into Vietnam nor did any acts of terror flow from it, thus it can be ignored as a purelyUS thing, bit like raising tax on petrol(gas).

Brian
 
I still don't see why JFK isn't demonized. The only reason I got from you was that he was killed and therefore has gained sympathy in the history books.
 
Matty said:
I still don't see why JFK isn't demonized. The only reason I got from you was that he was killed and therefore has gained sympathy in the history books.

Is this a response to me or Rich or Col?

If me my point is that what he did did not have a negative effect on the UK and it is, I think, UK posters who are demonizing GWB and not others.

Brian
 
Brianwarnock said:
The rest of the world, ie Europe, was not dragged into Vietnam nor did any acts of terror flow from it, thus it can be ignored as a purelyUS thing, bit like raising tax on petrol(gas).

But surely Vietnam was a part of the Cold War which of course had global significance.
 
Brianwarnock said:
Is this a response to me or Rich or Col?

If me my point is that what he did did not have a negative effect on the UK and it is, I think, UK posters who are demonizing GWB and not others.

Brian

Sorry, it wasn't to you. I forgot to quote. It was actually to Rich. :o
 
dan-cat said:
Rule for GWB: Use of foreign policy to demonize allowed
Rule for LBJ: Use of foreign policy to demonize not allowed? :confused:


Was America as divided (at the start of Vietnam) as it is with Iraq. My understanding is that the anti-Vietnam protest did not start until about 66, 67, and really kicked in with conscription?

GWB seems to have built almost his whole presidency on the "War on Terror". It is almost the sole thing he will be remembered for (out side the US)

LBJ is hardly remembered at all.

I am sure if JFK was not shot history would have seen his presidency diffrently, and he would not be remembered in such a rose tinted way.
 
dan-cat said:
But surely Vietnam was a part of the Cold War which of course had global significance.
No it was an American war, we weren't so paranoid over socialism and justice
 
Brianwarnock said:
If me my point is that what he did did not have a negative effect on the UK and it is, I think, UK posters who are demonizing GWB and not others.

Wasn't it JFK who deployed nuclear warheads in the UK which resulted in the Cuban Missile Crisis?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom