I resent the insinuation that I am opinion shopping: I have something that needs to be done.
I don't know what that was all about other than to insinuate I am trying to waste peoples time.
Yes, and the fact you actually DO have a problem is why I didn't ban you instantly with that attitude. We RECOGNIZE that you have a problem. Let me try to say it another way. The correct way to do what you did is to tell us:
I asked this question on UtterAccess at this page link: xxxxx and got an insufficient (or no) answer. I am therefore seeking other opinions.
If you do that, we can first check the link to see what you were told that WAS inadequate and see if we can do better. Or we can point out that the answer you were given should have worked and then ask "What went wrong?" Having knowledge of that link, we can BUILD on what was done that was not so positive.
The point is that when we are unaware of other instances of this question on the multiple forums that are out there, we might spend a few hours to develop an answer AND THEN find out someone else had already given you the same answer. Does that perhaps explain why we seriously dislike the act of silently cross-posting a question? Does that more clearly explain the insinuation of "time wasting"? To us, that IS opinion-shopping and I don't think any of us care if you don't like that term. I know that I call them as I see them. And as my Cajun cousins would say, "If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck and flies like a duck, it ain't a
poullet-doux."
As to putting your review on the homepage, that privilege is reserved to the site owner. You certainly are free to send a post to him. His
nom-de-site is "Jon" and he is pretty good about answering posts directed his way. Allow for him to be in a UK timezone when you post.